PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRT vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDRT vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRT achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return.


LDRT

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.95%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDRT vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LDRT
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF
0.72%5.55%0.44%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%-7.55%

Correlation

The correlation between LDRT and SLV is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDRT vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRT
LDRT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LDRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDRT vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDRTSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

2.62

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

5.64

+3.71

LDRT vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRT and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDRTSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.89

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

0.25

+1.31

Drawdowns

LDRT vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRT drawdown since its inception was -1.11%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRT and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRTSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.11%

-76.28%

+75.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

-42.45%

+41.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-37.30%

+36.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-44.67%

+44.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

19.67%

-19.25%

Volatility

LDRT vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) is 0.88%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that LDRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDRTSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

16.30%

-15.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

58.31%

-56.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80%

58.90%

-56.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

36.15%

-33.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.79%

31.84%

-29.05%

LDRT vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDRT vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

LDRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
LDRT
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF
4.09%3.86%0.69%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDRT and SLV have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to LDRT (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRT dropped -1.11% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 110.59% vs 3.88% for LDRT. On fees, LDRT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, LDRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 110.59% return vs 3.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

LDRT has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

LDRT is categorized as Government Bonds, while SLV is Silver. LDRT tracks BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LDRT and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDRT and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer