PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRI vs. TIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDRI vs. TIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 Year TIPS ETF (TIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRI achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than TIPX's 1.17% return.


LDRI

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.02%
6M
1.20%
YTD
1.55%
1Y
2.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.39%

TIPX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.11%
6M
0.59%
YTD
1.17%
1Y
2.47%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
2.84%
ALL TIME*
2.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$174.90K$199.08K$209.34K
$5.51M$5.69M$8.31M

LDRI vs. TIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LDRI
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF
1.55%5.94%0.10%
TIPX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 Year TIPS ETF
1.17%7.15%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between LDRI and TIPX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024

0.64

The correlation between LDRI and TIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDRI vs. TIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LDRI
LDRI Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LDRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRI Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRI Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TIPX
TIPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LDRI vs. TIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 Year TIPS ETF (TIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDRITIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.21

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

2.41

+2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

6.42

+6.78

LDRI vs. TIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRI Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the TIPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRI and TIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDRI vs. TIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRI drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, smaller than the maximum TIPX drawdown of -10.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRI and TIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRITIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-10.06%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.63%

-1.29%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.84%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-2.27%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

0.48%

-0.23%

Volatility

LDRI vs. TIPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) is 0.48%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 Year TIPS ETF (TIPX) has a volatility of 0.65%. This indicates that LDRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDRITIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

0.65%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.21%

1.99%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86%

2.64%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.26%

4.62%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.26%

4.31%

-2.05%

LDRI vs. TIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRI has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TIPX's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LDRI vs. TIPX - Dividend Comparison

LDRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than TIPX's 5.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDRI
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF
5.02%4.23%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIPX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 Year TIPS ETF
4.87%3.78%3.57%3.57%6.08%4.26%1.73%2.53%1.90%2.84%1.04%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDRI and TIPX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIPX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to LDRI (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRI dropped -0.85% vs TIPX's -10.06%.

On 1-year performance, LDRI leads with 2.94% vs 2.47% for TIPX. On fees, LDRI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, LDRI has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LDRI has performed better with a 2.94% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TIPX.

LDRI has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 4.87% for TIPX.

LDRI tracks BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index, while TIPX tracks Bloomberg US Govt Inflation-Linked (1-10 Y). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LDRI and 0.15% for TIPX.

LDRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDRI and TIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer