LDRH vs. SMST

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDRH is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index, while SMST is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. LDRH is passively managed, while SMST is actively managed. Over the past year, LDRH returned 5.66% vs 223.04% for SMST. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. LDRH charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SMST.

Performance

LDRH vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRH achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -31.56% return.

LDRH

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 1.82%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 1Y: 5.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMST

• 1D: -1.67%
• 1M: 37.17%
• 6M: -24.18%
• YTD: -31.56%
• 1Y: 223.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDRH vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	2.11%	7.18%	0.21%
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF	-31.56%	-44.36%	-63.34%

Correlation

The correlation between LDRH and SMST is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024	-0.35

Return for Risk

LDRH vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRH

LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 90
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 87
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SMST

SMST Risk / Return Rank: 53
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDRH vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LDRH	SMST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.37	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	2.22	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.29	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	2.39	+2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.16	4.64	+14.52

LDRH vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRH Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRH and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LDRH vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRH drawdown since its inception was -3.17%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRH and SMST.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDRH	SMST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-99.25%	+96.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.23%	-85.39%	+84.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-97.31%	+97.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-90.88%	+90.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	43.98%	-43.68%

Volatility

LDRH vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) is 0.61%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 56.47%. This indicates that LDRH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDRH	SMST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	56.47%	-55.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.96%	135.94%	-133.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61%	149.09%	-146.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.44%	167.87%	-164.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.44%	167.87%	-164.43%

LDRH vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDRH vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

LDRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	6.96%	6.41%	1.13%
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDRH and SMST in my portfolio?

LDRH and SMST have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LDRH or SMST?

SMST has higher volatility (56.47%) compared to LDRH (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRH dropped -3.17% vs SMST's -99.25%.

Which ETF is better, LDRH or SMST?

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 223.04% vs 5.66% for LDRH. On fees, LDRH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LDRH or SMST?

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 223.04% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDRH or SMST?

LDRH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LDRH or SMST?

LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.96%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

What is the main difference between LDRH and SMST?

LDRH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LDRH and 1.29% for SMST.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.