PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRC vs. SPTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDRC vs. SPTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF (LDRC) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with LDRC at 0.75% and SPTS at 0.75%.


LDRC

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.50%
6M
0.51%
YTD
0.75%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.26%

SPTS

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.58%
YTD
0.75%
1Y
2.62%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
1.64%
ALL TIME*
1.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$277.08K$298.53K$510.97K
$23.39M$28.59M$39.91M

LDRC vs. SPTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LDRC
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF
0.75%6.33%0.31%
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
0.75%5.05%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between LDRC and SPTS is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024

0.64

The correlation between LDRC and SPTS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDRC vs. SPTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LDRC
LDRC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTS
SPTS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SPTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LDRC vs. SPTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF (LDRC) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDRCSPTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.76

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.87

14.64

-4.78

LDRC vs. SPTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRC Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the SPTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRC and SPTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDRC vs. SPTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRC drawdown since its inception was -1.00%, smaller than the maximum SPTS drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRC and SPTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRCSPTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-5.83%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.00%

-0.84%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.07%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-1.70%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.21%

+0.16%

Volatility

LDRC vs. SPTS - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF (LDRC) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) at 0.41%. This indicates that LDRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDRCSPTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

0.41%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.26%

1.00%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

1.34%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.45%

2.00%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.45%

1.70%

+0.75%

LDRC vs. SPTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LDRC vs. SPTS - Dividend Comparison

LDRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than SPTS's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDRC
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder ETF
4.22%4.22%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPTS
SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF
3.54%3.99%4.25%3.61%1.27%0.19%0.70%2.21%2.04%1.20%0.95%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDRC and SPTS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LDRC has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to SPTS (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRC dropped -1.00% vs SPTS's -5.83%.

On 1-year performance, LDRC leads with 3.12% vs 2.62% for SPTS. On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTS has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LDRC has performed better with a 3.12% return vs 2.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for LDRC.

LDRC has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 3.54% for SPTS.

LDRC is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SPTS is Government Bonds. LDRC tracks BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year Corporate Ladder Index, while SPTS tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LDRC and 0.03% for SPTS.

SPTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDRC and SPTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer