PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDP vs. NPSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDP vs. NPSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LDP) and Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund (NPSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDP achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than NPSRX's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, LDP has outperformed NPSRX with an annualized return of 6.29%, while NPSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.21% annualized return.


LDP

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
0.29%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
13.54%
5Y*
2.98%
10Y*
6.29%

NPSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.40%
1Y
8.78%
3Y*
10.01%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
5.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDP vs. NPSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LDP
Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund
0.29%13.04%18.49%5.79%-22.31%7.81%9.49%29.72%-9.69%14.56%
NPSRX
Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund
0.72%11.19%9.12%6.19%-9.50%5.43%5.53%17.68%-5.65%11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LDP and NPSRX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2012

0.34

The correlation between LDP and NPSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDP vs. NPSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDP
LDP Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDP Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDP Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

NPSRX
NPSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NPSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NPSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDP vs. NPSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LDP) and Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund (NPSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDPNPSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.72

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.70

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

10.81

-7.26

LDP vs. NPSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDP Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the NPSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDP and NPSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDPNPSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.96

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.73

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.83

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.49

-0.13

Drawdowns

LDP vs. NPSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDP drawdown since its inception was -49.59%, smaller than the maximum NPSRX drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDP and NPSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDPNPSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.59%

-62.52%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-3.30%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.02%

-3.60%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.12%

-17.65%

-14.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.59%

-26.47%

-23.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-0.67%

-1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-4.82%

-1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

0.82%

+1.42%

Volatility

LDP vs. NPSRX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LDP) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund (NPSRX) at 1.03%. This indicates that LDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NPSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDPNPSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

1.03%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

2.41%

+5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.54%

3.02%

+6.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

4.99%

+8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

6.33%

+13.76%

LDP vs. NPSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDP has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than NPSRX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDP vs. NPSRX - Dividend Comparison

LDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, more than NPSRX's 5.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDP
Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund
7.64%7.43%7.78%8.66%8.52%7.99%6.74%7.14%8.58%7.56%7.67%8.31%
NPSRX
Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Fund
5.39%5.72%5.38%5.87%6.18%4.97%5.02%5.39%6.00%5.51%5.81%6.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDP and NPSRX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LDP has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to NPSRX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDP dropped -49.59% vs NPSRX's -62.52%.

NPSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDP and NPSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer