PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDP vs. FICVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDP vs. FICVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LDP) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDP achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than FICVX's 24.00% return. Over the past 10 years, LDP has underperformed FICVX with an annualized return of 6.50%, while FICVX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.


LDP

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.83%
YTD
2.16%
6M
1.77%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
6.50%

FICVX

1D
1.22%
1M
3.09%
YTD
24.00%
6M
21.62%
1Y
41.80%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDP vs. FICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LDP
Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund
2.16%13.04%18.49%5.79%-22.31%7.81%9.49%29.72%-9.69%14.56%
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
24.00%18.28%8.11%11.39%-15.38%9.93%42.46%28.58%-1.31%9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LDP and FICVX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2012

0.35

The correlation between LDP and FICVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDP vs. FICVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDP
LDP Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDP Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FICVX
FICVX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDP vs. FICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LDP) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDPFICVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.46

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

5.89

-4.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

21.34

-17.63

LDP vs. FICVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDP Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the FICVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDP and FICVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDP vs. FICVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDP drawdown since its inception was -49.59%, which is greater than FICVX's maximum drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDP and FICVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDPFICVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.59%

-25.06%

-24.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-7.14%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.02%

-18.88%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.12%

-24.20%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.59%

-25.06%

-24.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-1.12%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-5.62%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

1.97%

+0.29%

Volatility

LDP vs. FICVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LDP) is 2.06%, while Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that LDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDPFICVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

6.46%

-4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

12.96%

-5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

15.82%

-6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

13.70%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

13.76%

+6.33%

LDP vs. FICVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDP has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FICVX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDP vs. FICVX - Dividend Comparison

LDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, less than FICVX's 8.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
8.91%11.38%2.02%2.12%3.73%20.65%10.73%3.28%9.85%4.09%4.90%10.39%
LDP
Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund
7.55%7.43%7.78%8.66%8.52%7.99%6.74%7.14%8.58%7.56%7.67%8.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDP and FICVX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FICVX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to LDP (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDP dropped -49.59% vs FICVX's -25.06%.

FICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDP and FICVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer