PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDP vs. JPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDP vs. JPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LDP) and Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund (JPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDP achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than JPC's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LDP has outperformed JPC with an annualized return of 6.46%, while JPC has yielded a comparatively lower 5.69% annualized return.


LDP

1D
-0.38%
1M
2.44%
YTD
1.77%
6M
1.81%
1Y
7.84%
3Y*
13.46%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
6.46%

JPC

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.77%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
5.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDP vs. JPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LDP
Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund
1.77%13.04%18.49%5.79%-22.31%7.81%9.49%29.72%-9.69%14.56%
JPC
Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund
0.03%14.00%27.58%0.75%-19.18%9.75%-2.09%35.25%-12.70%13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between LDP and JPC is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2012

0.45

The correlation between LDP and JPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDP vs. JPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDP
LDP Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
LDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDP Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDP Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

JPC
JPC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
JPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPC Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
JPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDP vs. JPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LDP) and Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund (JPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDPJPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.66

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.48

3.45

+0.03

LDP vs. JPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDP Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the JPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDP and JPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDP vs. JPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDP drawdown since its inception was -49.59%, smaller than the maximum JPC drawdown of -76.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDP and JPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDPJPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.59%

-76.07%

+26.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-11.43%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.02%

-11.65%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.12%

-32.26%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.59%

-52.53%

+2.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-3.16%

+2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-9.93%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.19%

+0.07%

Volatility

LDP vs. JPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LDP) is 2.10%, while Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund (JPC) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that LDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDPJPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

2.58%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

9.95%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.62%

11.33%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

14.52%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

20.64%

-0.55%

LDP vs. JPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDP has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is higher than JPC's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LDP vs. JPC - Dividend Comparison

LDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, less than JPC's 9.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPC
Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund
9.95%9.79%8.94%8.00%8.74%6.52%6.95%7.00%9.02%7.50%8.14%8.65%
LDP
Cohen and Steers Limited Duration Preferred and Income Fund
7.58%7.43%7.78%8.66%8.52%7.99%6.74%7.14%8.58%7.56%7.67%8.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDP and JPC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPC has higher volatility (2.58%) compared to LDP (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDP dropped -49.59% vs JPC's -76.07%.

LDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDP and JPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer