JPC vs. CRF
JPC (Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund) and CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) are both mutual funds - JPC is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund managed by Nuveen, while CRF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Cornerstone. Over the past 10 years, JPC returned 5.69%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for CRF. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JPC charges 0.01%/yr vs 1.84%/yr for CRF.
Performance
JPC vs. CRF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPC achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, JPC has underperformed CRF with an annualized return of 5.69%, while CRF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.
JPC
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 7.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
CRF
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- -2.25%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 15.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
JPC vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPC Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund | 0.03% | 14.00% | 27.58% | 0.75% | -19.18% | 9.75% | -2.09% | 35.25% | -12.70% | 13.35% |
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | -2.25% | 12.46% | 44.39% | 19.49% | -36.70% | 39.73% | 28.13% | 21.74% | -11.74% | 21.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPC and CRF is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2003 | 0.28 |
The correlation between JPC and CRF shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPC vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank
JPC
CRF
JPC vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund (JPC) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPC | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.20 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 1.03 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 3.39 | +0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPC vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPC drawdown since its inception was -76.07%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPC and CRF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPC | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.07% | -80.70% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -14.88% | +3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.65% | -29.66% | +18.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.26% | -43.12% | +10.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.53% | -45.90% | -6.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -4.04% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.93% | -22.30% | +12.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 4.52% | -2.34% |
Volatility
JPC vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund (JPC) is 2.59%, while Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that JPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPC | CRF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 3.03% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 13.47% | -3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.36% | 15.42% | -4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 25.07% | -10.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.64% | 25.87% | -5.23% |
JPC vs. CRF - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPC has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than CRF's 1.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPC vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison
JPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.95%, less than CRF's 19.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. | 19.75% | 17.38% | 14.32% | 19.94% | 29.31% | 13.41% | 18.91% | 21.67% | 24.85% | 17.96% | 24.08% | 23.58% |
JPC Nuveen Preferred and Income Opportunities Fund | 9.95% | 9.79% | 8.94% | 8.00% | 8.74% | 6.52% | 6.95% | 7.00% | 9.02% | 7.50% | 8.14% | 8.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPC and CRF have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRF has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to JPC (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPC dropped -76.07% vs CRF's -80.70%.
CRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPC and CRF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer