LDMIX vs. EAEMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LDMIX (Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio) and EAEMX (Parametric Emerging Markets Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LDMIX returned 8.49%/yr vs 6.24%/yr for EAEMX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LDMIX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for EAEMX.

Performance

LDMIX vs. EAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) and Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDMIX achieves a 20.50% return, which is significantly higher than EAEMX's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, LDMIX has outperformed EAEMX with an annualized return of 8.49%, while EAEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return.

LDMIX

• 1D: 2.79%
• 1M: -4.52%
• 6M: 10.68%
• YTD: 20.50%
• 1Y: 43.13%
• 3Y*: 18.45%
• 5Y*: 6.58%
• 10Y*: 8.49%
• ALL TIME*: 6.36%

EAEMX

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: 0.59%
• 6M: 1.45%
• YTD: 9.08%
• 1Y: 21.36%
• 3Y*: 12.86%
• 5Y*: 7.08%
• 10Y*: 6.24%
• ALL TIME*: 5.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LDMIX Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LDMIX vs. EAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LDMIX Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio	20.50%	33.67%	6.73%	9.68%	-22.61%	-10.14%	19.33%	28.17%	-20.57%	41.15%
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund	9.08%	27.16%	5.39%	9.46%	-11.27%	4.19%	2.65%	12.32%	-14.02%	27.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LDMIX and EAEMX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2008	0.90

The correlation between LDMIX and EAEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LDMIX vs. EAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LDMIX

LDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 72
LDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
LDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
LDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
LDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

EAEMX

EAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 61
EAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
EAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
EAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
EAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
EAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LDMIX vs. EAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) and Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LDMIX	EAEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.55	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.15	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.30	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	2.01	+0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.94	6.59	+2.35

LDMIX vs. EAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the EAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDMIX and EAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LDMIX vs. EAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDMIX drawdown since its inception was -51.12%, smaller than the maximum EAEMX drawdown of -62.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDMIX and EAEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDMIX	EAEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.12%	-62.70%	+11.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.14%	-9.90%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.55%	-11.74%	-7.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.77%	-24.73%	-13.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.20%	-44.16%	-2.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.75%	-3.68%	-8.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.63%	-13.40%	-6.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.49%	3.02%	+1.47%

Volatility

LDMIX vs. EAEMX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio (LDMIX) has a higher volatility of 9.75% compared to Parametric Emerging Markets Fund (EAEMX) at 3.99%. This indicates that LDMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDMIX	EAEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.75%	3.99%	+5.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.41%	11.47%	+8.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.57%	12.85%	+9.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.07%	11.86%	+7.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.65%	13.40%	+6.25%

LDMIX vs. EAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDMIX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EAEMX's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDMIX vs. EAEMX - Dividend Comparison

LDMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than EAEMX's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAEMX Parametric Emerging Markets Fund	2.59%	2.83%	3.00%	2.71%	4.40%	1.64%	1.08%	2.48%	2.14%	2.31%	1.52%	1.68%
LDMIX Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio	0.97%	1.17%	0.84%	2.24%	0.83%	1.00%	0.25%	0.54%	0.78%	0.20%	0.95%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDMIX and EAEMX in my portfolio?

LDMIX and EAEMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LDMIX or EAEMX?

LDMIX has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to EAEMX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDMIX dropped -51.12% vs EAEMX's -62.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.