LDME.L vs. EMIM.L
LDME.L (L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and EMIM.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - LDME.L tracks the FTSE Emerging All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Index while EMIM.L tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDME.L returned 9.58%/yr vs 7.04%/yr for EMIM.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LDME.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EMIM.L.
Performance
LDME.L vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDME.L achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly lower than EMIM.L's 14.67% return.
LDME.L
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 20.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- —
EMIM.L
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -9.58%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
LDME.L vs. EMIM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDME.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.73% | 16.54% | 11.33% | 10.64% | -2.34% | 7,358.59% |
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 14.67% | 23.35% | 9.18% | 4.93% | -10.17% | -2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDME.L and EMIM.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between LDME.L and EMIM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDME.L vs. EMIM.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDME.L
EMIM.L
LDME.L vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDME.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDME.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.39 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.15 | 7.60 | +0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDME.L vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDME.L drawdown since its inception was -14.82%, smaller than the maximum EMIM.L drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDME.L and EMIM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDME.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -31.70% | +16.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -11.95% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.82% | -15.56% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.82% | -20.99% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.32% | -11.95% | +5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -8.67% | +5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 3.76% | -1.30% |
Volatility
LDME.L vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (LDME.L) is 3.98%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) has a volatility of 8.14%. This indicates that LDME.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDME.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 8.14% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 17.20% | -7.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 19.28% | -7.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 16.43% | -3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3,215.14% | 18.01% | +3,197.13% |
LDME.L vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDME.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDME.L vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison
LDME.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, while EMIM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDME.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.88% | 3.04% | 3.67% | 3.56% | 4.57% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDME.L and EMIM.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMIM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMIM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LDME.L.
LDME.L tracks FTSE Emerging All Cap ex CW ex TC ex REITS Dividend Growth with Quality Index, while EMIM.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI). They also come from different issuers: L&G and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LDME.L and 0.18% for EMIM.L.
Find the right allocation for LDME.L and EMIM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer