LDEM vs. QEMM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM).
LDEM and QEMM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LDEM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2020. QEMM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD). It was launched on Jun 4, 2014. Both LDEM and QEMM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LDEM vs. QEMM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LDEM vs. QEMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF | -0.25% | 32.49% | 5.87% | 6.49% | -22.46% | -2.03% | 15.59% |
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF | 4.84% | 21.92% | 4.98% | 12.50% | -17.82% | 6.34% | 11.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDEM achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than QEMM's 4.84% return.
LDEM
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- -7.84%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 23.06%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- —
QEMM
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LDEM vs. QEMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than QEMM's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LDEM vs. QEMM — Risk / Return Rank
LDEM
QEMM
LDEM vs. QEMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDEM | QEMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.54 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 2.16 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.56 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 9.33 | -2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDEM | QEMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.54 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.32 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.26 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between LDEM and QEMM is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LDEM vs. QEMM - Dividend Comparison
LDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than QEMM's 4.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF | 3.26% | 3.26% | 2.64% | 3.20% | 4.93% | 1.82% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF | 4.67% | 4.90% | 5.17% | 4.88% | 4.07% | 2.35% | 2.48% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.11% | 2.03% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
LDEM vs. QEMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDEM drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, which is greater than QEMM's maximum drawdown of -36.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEM and QEMM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDEM | QEMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.82% | -36.89% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -10.40% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.17% | -27.55% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.37% | -7.76% | -2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -10.77% | -6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 2.85% | +0.80% |
Volatility
LDEM vs. QEMM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) is 8.07%, while SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that LDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QEMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LDEM | QEMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 9.11% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 12.57% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.39% | 17.21% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 14.81% | +4.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 16.73% | +4.03% |