PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDEM vs. EMDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDEM vs. EMDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEM achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than EMDM's 27.86% return.


LDEM

1D
0.21%
1M
1.22%
6M
-3.13%
YTD
3.29%
1Y
13.51%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.91%

EMDM

1D
0.46%
1M
-3.52%
6M
13.18%
YTD
27.86%
1Y
66.00%
3Y*
26.67%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$660.85K$757.43K$571.79K
$33.47K$44.13K$91.64K

LDEM vs. EMDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LDEM
iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF
3.29%32.49%5.87%1.37%
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
27.86%59.68%-4.93%14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEM and EMDM is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023

0.82

The correlation between LDEM and EMDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

LDEM vs. EMDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LDEM
EMDM

Financial Services

24.8%
25.6%

Technology

23.9%
39.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
5.3%

Communication Services

9.9%
4.0%

Industrials

7.6%
2.6%

Basic Materials

6.7%
12.7%

Energy

4.4%
4.8%

Healthcare

3.6%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.1%

Utilities

2.5%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Financial Services

LDEM
24.8%
EMDM
25.6%

Technology

LDEM
23.9%
EMDM
39.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LDEM
12.0%
EMDM
5.3%

Communication Services

LDEM
9.9%
EMDM
4.0%

Industrials

LDEM
7.6%
EMDM
2.6%

Basic Materials

LDEM
6.7%
EMDM
12.7%

Energy

LDEM
4.4%
EMDM
4.8%

Healthcare

LDEM
3.6%
EMDM
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

LDEM
3.4%
EMDM
3.1%

Utilities

LDEM
2.5%
EMDM
1.5%

Real Estate

LDEM
1.4%
EMDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDEM vs. EMDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LDEM
LDEM Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

EMDM
EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LDEM vs. EMDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDEMEMDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.41

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

4.23

-3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.61

13.54

-10.92

LDEM vs. EMDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the EMDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDEM and EMDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDEM vs. EMDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEM drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, which is greater than EMDM's maximum drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEM and EMDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDEMEMDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.82%

-18.81%

-22.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-15.65%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-18.81%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.19%

-10.88%

+3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.09%

-4.20%

-12.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

4.88%

-0.01%

Volatility

LDEM vs. EMDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) is 6.88%, while First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that LDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDEMEMDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

9.95%

-3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.06%

25.55%

-8.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.51%

27.87%

-8.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.49%

21.16%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

21.16%

-0.24%

LDEM vs. EMDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDM's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDEM vs. EMDM - Dividend Comparison

LDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, which matches EMDM's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
2.96%3.57%5.87%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDEM
iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF
2.97%3.26%2.64%3.20%4.93%1.82%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDEM and EMDM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMDM has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to LDEM (6.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDEM dropped -40.82% vs EMDM's -18.81%.

On 3-year performance, EMDM leads with 26.67% vs 11.73% for LDEM. On fees, LDEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, LDEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EMDM has performed better with a 26.67% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.

LDEM and EMDM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.97%.

LDEM tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index, while EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for LDEM and 0.75% for EMDM.

EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDEM and EMDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer