LDEG.L vs. VDPG.L
LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) and VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LDEG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDEG.L returned 16.40%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for VDPG.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDEG.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VDPG.L.
Performance
LDEG.L vs. VDPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LDEG.L is traded in GBp, while VDPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VDPG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDEG.L achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly lower than VDPG.L's 47.65% return.
LDEG.L
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 14.78%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- 24.60%
- 5Y*
- 16.40%
- 10Y*
- —
VDPG.L
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 47.65%
- 6M
- 52.89%
- 1Y
- 79.33%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
LDEG.L vs. VDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 12.38% | 44.91% | 8.81% | 14.31% | 1.91% | -8.28% |
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 47.65% | 30.58% | -3.06% | 4.10% | -1.89% | -3.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDEG.L and VDPG.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021 | 0.59 |
The correlation between LDEG.L and VDPG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LDEG.L vs. VDPG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
Industrials
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
Basic Materials
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
Utilities
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
Energy
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
Communication Services
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
Healthcare
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
Consumer Cyclical
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
Consumer Defensive
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
Technology
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
Real Estate
LDEG.L
-
VDPG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDEG.L vs. VDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDEG.L
VDPG.L
LDEG.L vs. VDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDEG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.65 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 5.87 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.14 | 20.42 | -6.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDEG.L vs. VDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDEG.L drawdown since its inception was -21.96%, smaller than the maximum VDPG.L drawdown of -40.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEG.L and VDPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDEG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.96% | -40.69% | +18.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -13.45% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.05% | -26.18% | +14.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.39% | -26.18% | +8.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.74% | +4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -11.24% | +5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 3.87% | -1.66% |
Volatility
LDEG.L vs. VDPG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) is 3.50%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a volatility of 11.04%. This indicates that LDEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDEG.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 11.04% | -7.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 19.69% | -10.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 21.82% | -10.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 21.25% | -7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.22% | 23.27% | -8.05% |
LDEG.L vs. VDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDEG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VDPG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LDEG.L vs. VDPG.L - Dividend Comparison
LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, while VDPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.56% | 3.42% | 4.20% | 4.10% | 3.69% | 3.06% |
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDEG.L and VDPG.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.
LDEG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while VDPG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEG.L and 0.15% for VDPG.L.
Find the right allocation for LDEG.L and VDPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer