PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDEG.L vs. BCOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDEG.L vs. BCOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDEG.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than BCOG.L's 24.98% return.


LDEG.L

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
10.41%
6M
14.16%
1Y
30.16%
3Y*
23.92%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*

BCOG.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
24.98%
6M
21.68%
1Y
37.95%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDEG.L vs. BCOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
10.41%44.92%8.83%14.32%3.42%2.83%
BCOG.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF
24.98%8.16%6.13%-12.32%29.36%9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between LDEG.L and BCOG.L is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021

0.04

The correlation between LDEG.L and BCOG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.05 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LDEG.L vs. BCOG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LDEG.L
BCOG.L

Financial Services

41.5%
17.8%

Industrials

15.8%

-

Basic Materials

9.9%
35.8%

Utilities

8.2%

-

Energy

7.7%

-

Communication Services

5.2%
12.3%

Healthcare

3.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
9.7%

Technology

2.0%
5.6%

Real Estate

-

5.8%

Financial Services

LDEG.L
41.5%
BCOG.L
17.8%

Industrials

LDEG.L
15.8%
BCOG.L

-

Basic Materials

LDEG.L
9.9%
BCOG.L
35.8%

Utilities

LDEG.L
8.2%
BCOG.L

-

Energy

LDEG.L
7.7%
BCOG.L

-

Communication Services

LDEG.L
5.2%
BCOG.L
12.3%

Healthcare

LDEG.L
3.4%
BCOG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

LDEG.L
3.3%
BCOG.L
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

LDEG.L
3.1%
BCOG.L
9.7%

Technology

LDEG.L
2.0%
BCOG.L
5.6%

Real Estate

LDEG.L

-

BCOG.L
5.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDEG.L vs. BCOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDEG.L
LDEG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDEG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BCOG.L
BCOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDEG.L vs. BCOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDEG.LBCOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.37

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

4.43

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.82

10.23

+3.59

LDEG.L vs. BCOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDEG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDEG.L and BCOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDEG.LBCOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.05

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

0.74

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.49

+0.74

Drawdowns

LDEG.L vs. BCOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDEG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.97%, smaller than the maximum BCOG.L drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEG.L and BCOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDEG.LBCOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.97%

-28.15%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-8.57%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.05%

-14.48%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.97%

-27.76%

+11.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-5.16%

+3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-11.67%

+8.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

3.72%

-1.52%

Volatility

LDEG.L vs. BCOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) is 3.57%, while L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that LDEG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDEG.LBCOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

6.06%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

15.89%

-6.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

18.51%

-6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

16.89%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

15.71%

+0.30%

LDEG.L vs. BCOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDEG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BCOG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LDEG.L vs. BCOG.L - Dividend Comparison

LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while BCOG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BCOG.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDEG.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF
3.13%3.43%4.21%4.11%3.70%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDEG.L and BCOG.L have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCOG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCOG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.

LDEG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while BCOG.L is Commodities. LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while BCOG.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LDEG.L and 0.15% for BCOG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDEG.L and BCOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer