LCUK.L vs. ACWL.L
LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and ACWL.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCUK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while ACWL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCUK.L returned 10.01%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for ACWL.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCUK.L charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACWL.L.
Performance
LCUK.L vs. ACWL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LCUK.L is traded in GBP, while ACWL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ACWL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCUK.L achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than ACWL.L's 12.22% return.
LCUK.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 16.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWL.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 12.22%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 29.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
LCUK.L vs. ACWL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 5.93% | 21.01% | 9.05% | 7.25% | 2.15% | 18.06% | -11.83% | 18.73% | -0.85% |
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 12.22% | 13.63% | 21.43% | 13.09% | -8.59% | 20.41% | 9.74% | 18.01% | 3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUK.L and ACWL.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, LCUK.L and ACWL.L have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
LCUK.L vs. ACWL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Industrials
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Consumer Defensive
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Healthcare
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Energy
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Basic Materials
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Consumer Cyclical
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Utilities
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Communication Services
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Real Estate
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Technology
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCUK.L vs. ACWL.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCUK.L
ACWL.L
LCUK.L vs. ACWL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCUK.L | ACWL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.58 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 4.20 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.79 | 17.39 | -11.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCUK.L | ACWL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 3.01 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.89 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 2.35 | -1.85 |
Drawdowns
LCUK.L vs. ACWL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUK.L drawdown since its inception was -35.54%, which is greater than ACWL.L's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUK.L and ACWL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCUK.L | ACWL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.54% | -18.15% | -17.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -7.06% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.65% | -18.15% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.65% | -18.15% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.98% | -0.22% | -3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -2.43% | -2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 1.71% | +1.14% |
Volatility
LCUK.L vs. ACWL.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that LCUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCUK.L | ACWL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 2.63% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 6.99% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.92% | 9.84% | +2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 16.52% | -3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 23.32% | -7.63% |
LCUK.L vs. ACWL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCUK.L has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCUK.L vs. ACWL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCUK.L nor ACWL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWL.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.68% | 3.05% | 3.94% | 3.86% | 3.00% | 3.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCUK.L and ACWL.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWL.L.
LCUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while ACWL.L is Global Equities. LCUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while ACWL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for LCUK.L and 0.45% for ACWL.L.
Find the right allocation for LCUK.L and ACWL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer