LCUA.DE vs. WTDX.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) and WTDX.DE (WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - LCUA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while WTDX.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCUA.DE returned 7.30%/yr vs 27.20%/yr for WTDX.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCUA.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for WTDX.DE.

Performance

LCUA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged (WTDX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LCUA.DE having a 21.76% return and WTDX.DE slightly higher at 22.21%.

LCUA.DE

• 1D: -2.34%
• 1M: -9.36%
• 6M: 14.48%
• YTD: 21.76%
• 1Y: 34.32%
• 3Y*: 19.89%
• 5Y*: 7.30%
• 10Y*: —

WTDX.DE

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: -1.31%
• 6M: 12.25%
• YTD: 22.21%
• 1Y: 51.38%
• 3Y*: 29.84%
• 5Y*: 27.20%
• 10Y*: 17.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc	21.76%	18.10%	18.44%	3.32%	-14.89%	1.92%	15.54%	22.25%	-10.88%
WTDX.DE WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged	22.21%	17.86%	36.79%	37.12%	11.85%	27.70%	-6.91%	24.57%	-8.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LCUA.DE and WTDX.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018	0.33

The correlation between LCUA.DE and WTDX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LCUA.DE vs. WTDX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUA.DE

LCUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 61
LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
LCUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
LCUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LCUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
LCUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

WTDX.DE

WTDX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 93
WTDX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
WTDX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
WTDX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
WTDX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
WTDX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged (WTDX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCUA.DE	WTDX.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.61	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	3.48	-1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.46	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	6.32	-3.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.36	20.92	-12.56

LCUA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the WTDX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUA.DE and WTDX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCUA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.14%, smaller than the maximum WTDX.DE drawdown of -38.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUA.DE and WTDX.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCUA.DE	WTDX.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.14%	-38.23%	+5.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.17%	-8.09%	-5.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.07%	-23.65%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.02%	-23.65%	-3.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.17%	-4.85%	-8.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.92%	-9.16%	-2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	2.45%	+1.65%

Volatility

LCUA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged (WTDX.DE) at 5.85%. This indicates that LCUA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTDX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCUA.DE	WTDX.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.85%	5.85%	+4.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.34%	14.87%	+5.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.91%	19.82%	+3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.14%	19.46%	-0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.78%	21.53%	-1.75%

LCUA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCUA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WTDX.DE's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCUA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Dividend Comparison

LCUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WTDX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WTDX.DE WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged	0.83%	1.68%	1.52%	1.97%	2.28%	1.52%	2.10%	2.01%	2.17%	1.14%	1.90%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCUA.DE and WTDX.DE in my portfolio?

LCUA.DE and WTDX.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LCUA.DE or WTDX.DE?

On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCUA.DE or WTDX.DE?

LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for WTDX.DE.

What is the main difference between LCUA.DE and WTDX.DE?

LCUA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while WTDX.DE is Japan Equities. LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while WTDX.DE tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCUA.DE and 0.48% for WTDX.DE.