PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCUA.DE vs. VGEK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCUA.DE vs. VGEK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VGEK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCUA.DE achieves a 31.85% return, which is significantly lower than VGEK.DE's 49.52% return.


LCUA.DE

1D
-1.97%
1M
5.12%
YTD
31.85%
6M
32.05%
1Y
53.21%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*

VGEK.DE

1D
-3.21%
1M
6.68%
YTD
49.52%
6M
54.00%
1Y
77.62%
3Y*
24.83%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUA.DE vs. VGEK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LCUA.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc
31.85%18.08%18.51%3.26%-14.89%1.98%15.44%9.99%
VGEK.DE
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
49.52%25.03%1.02%6.43%-7.37%9.39%8.22%6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LCUA.DE and VGEK.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.80

The correlation between LCUA.DE and VGEK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCUA.DE vs. VGEK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUA.DE
LCUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VGEK.DE
VGEK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VGEK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGEK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGEK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VGEK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGEK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUA.DE vs. VGEK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VGEK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCUA.DEVGEK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.66

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

6.17

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.33

24.03

-7.70

LCUA.DE vs. VGEK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the VGEK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUA.DE and VGEK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCUA.DEVGEK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

3.77

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.76

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.69

-0.21

Drawdowns

LCUA.DE vs. VGEK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, smaller than the maximum VGEK.DE drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUA.DE and VGEK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCUA.DEVGEK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.18%

-36.64%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-12.88%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.07%

-19.68%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.54%

-19.68%

-8.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-3.76%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-6.08%

-5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.32%

+0.02%

Volatility

LCUA.DE vs. VGEK.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) is 8.54%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VGEK.DE) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that LCUA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGEK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCUA.DEVGEK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.54%

10.20%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.04%

18.52%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.08%

21.09%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

16.60%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.46%

19.60%

-0.14%

LCUA.DE vs. VGEK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCUA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VGEK.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCUA.DE vs. VGEK.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCUA.DE nor VGEK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LCUA.DE and VGEK.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VGEK.DE.

LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while VGEK.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCUA.DE and 0.15% for VGEK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCUA.DE and VGEK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer