LCUA.DE vs. LYMD.DE
LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) and LYMD.DE (Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Amundi - LCUA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while LYMD.DE tracks the MSCI India. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCUA.DE returned 8.90%/yr vs 3.60%/yr for LYMD.DE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCUA.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for LYMD.DE.
Performance
LCUA.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCUA.DE achieves a 31.85% return, which is significantly higher than LYMD.DE's -11.03% return.
LCUA.DE
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 31.85%
- 6M
- 33.69%
- 1Y
- 54.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
LYMD.DE
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -11.03%
- 6M
- -12.28%
- 1Y
- -15.14%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.18%
LCUA.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 31.85% | 18.08% | 18.51% | 3.26% | -14.89% | 1.98% | 15.44% | 22.39% | -10.90% |
LYMD.DE Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -11.03% | -10.62% | 15.81% | 14.99% | -2.96% | 34.12% | 2.23% | 9.49% | 5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCUA.DE and LYMD.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between LCUA.DE and LYMD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCUA.DE vs. LYMD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LCUA.DE
LYMD.DE
LCUA.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCUA.DE | LYMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.86 | +0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.49 | -0.71 | +5.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.33 | -1.49 | +17.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCUA.DE | LYMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | -0.91 | +3.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.22 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.17 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
LCUA.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, smaller than the maximum LYMD.DE drawdown of -68.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUA.DE and LYMD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCUA.DE | LYMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.18% | -68.71% | +35.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -20.60% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.07% | -29.55% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.54% | -29.55% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.86% | -26.17% | +23.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -18.32% | +6.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 9.84% | -6.50% |
Volatility
LCUA.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) at 5.64%. This indicates that LCUA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCUA.DE | LYMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.54% | 5.64% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 13.24% | +3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.08% | 16.06% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 16.15% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 20.15% | -0.69% |
LCUA.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCUA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LYMD.DE's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCUA.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCUA.DE nor LYMD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCUA.DE and LYMD.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LYMD.DE.
LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while LYMD.DE tracks MSCI India. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCUA.DE and 0.85% for LYMD.DE.
Find the right allocation for LCUA.DE and LYMD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer