PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCUA.DE vs. LYBK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCUA.DE vs. LYBK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCUA.DE achieves a 31.85% return, which is significantly higher than LYBK.DE's 5.35% return.


LCUA.DE

1D
-1.97%
1M
7.77%
YTD
31.85%
6M
33.69%
1Y
54.70%
3Y*
22.72%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*

LYBK.DE

1D
0.92%
1M
2.70%
YTD
5.35%
6M
12.73%
1Y
39.28%
3Y*
45.91%
5Y*
29.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUA.DE vs. LYBK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LCUA.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc
31.85%18.08%18.51%3.26%-14.89%1.98%15.44%22.39%-10.90%
LYBK.DE
Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc
5.35%91.46%30.53%30.34%0.78%39.97%-22.43%17.74%-27.73%

Correlation

The correlation between LCUA.DE and LYBK.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCUA.DE vs. LYBK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUA.DE
LCUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

LYBK.DE
LYBK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LYBK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYBK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUA.DE vs. LYBK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCUA.DELYBK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.29

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

2.41

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.33

7.56

+8.77

LCUA.DE vs. LYBK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the LYBK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUA.DE and LYBK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCUA.DELYBK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

1.72

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

1.13

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.46

+0.02

Drawdowns

LCUA.DE vs. LYBK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.18%, smaller than the maximum LYBK.DE drawdown of -62.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUA.DE and LYBK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCUA.DELYBK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.18%

-62.22%

+29.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-17.12%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.07%

-19.90%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.54%

-34.32%

+5.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-1.83%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-19.62%

+7.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

5.47%

-2.13%

Volatility

LCUA.DE vs. LYBK.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Amundi Euro Stoxx Banks UCITS ETF Acc (LYBK.DE) at 5.84%. This indicates that LCUA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYBK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCUA.DELYBK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.54%

5.84%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.04%

19.19%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.08%

23.95%

-3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.48%

25.45%

-6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.46%

28.55%

-9.09%

LCUA.DE vs. LYBK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCUA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LYBK.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCUA.DE vs. LYBK.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCUA.DE nor LYBK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LCUA.DE and LYBK.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYBK.DE.

LCUA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while LYBK.DE is Financials Equities. LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while LYBK.DE tracks EURO STOXX® Banks. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCUA.DE and 0.30% for LYBK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCUA.DE and LYBK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer