LCTRX vs. TIBDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX).
LCTRX is managed by LEADER. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010. TIBDX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Jul 1, 1999.
Performance
LCTRX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCTRX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTRX Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares | -0.02% | 4.72% | 6.03% | 8.26% | 2.22% | 1.99% | 12.07% | 1.15% | 6.01% | 4.28% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | -0.69% | 7.38% | 1.95% | 5.63% | -13.68% | -0.95% | 8.10% | 9.57% | -0.64% | 4.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCTRX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly higher than TIBDX's -0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, LCTRX has outperformed TIBDX with an annualized return of 5.03%, while TIBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.99% annualized return.
LCTRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
TIBDX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCTRX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCTRX has a 2.33% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCTRX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank
LCTRX
TIBDX
LCTRX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCTRX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 1.06 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.94 | 1.51 | +2.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.19 | +0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 1.62 | +1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.28 | 5.07 | +5.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCTRX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.06 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.02 | 0.03 | +1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.42 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.95 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCTRX and TIBDX is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LCTRX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison
LCTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than TIBDX's 4.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTRX Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares | 5.01% | 5.53% | 5.57% | 5.31% | 2.18% | 1.69% | 1.17% | 2.40% | 3.31% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 4.04% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 3.22% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 4.45% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 3.80% | 4.68% |
Drawdowns
LCTRX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCTRX drawdown since its inception was -26.09%, which is greater than TIBDX's maximum drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTRX and TIBDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCTRX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.09% | -18.82% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.17% | -2.98% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.82% | -18.82% | +15.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.93% | -18.82% | -5.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -2.56% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -2.31% | -1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 0.95% | -0.60% |
Volatility
LCTRX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) is 0.55%, while TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that LCTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCTRX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 1.57% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.32% | 2.55% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90% | 4.26% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.47% | 5.59% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 4.71% | +1.61% |