PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTRX vs. RCTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCTRX vs. RCTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTRX achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than RCTIX's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LCTRX has underperformed RCTIX with an annualized return of 4.83%, while RCTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.54% annualized return.


LCTRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.24%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
4.83%

RCTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
0.71%
6M
1.46%
1Y
5.24%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
5.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTRX vs. RCTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
1.78%4.72%6.03%8.26%2.22%1.99%12.07%1.15%6.01%4.28%
RCTIX
River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund
0.71%7.75%7.49%10.02%-4.07%4.26%6.42%11.71%1.82%9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTRX and RCTIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.08

Over the past year, LCTRX and RCTIX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCTRX vs. RCTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTRX
LCTRX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LCTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

RCTIX
RCTIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RCTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RCTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTRX vs. RCTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCTRXRCTIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

2.27

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.58

3.42

+2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.95

1.46

+0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

4.63

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.23

15.50

+3.74

LCTRX vs. RCTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the RCTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTRX and RCTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCTRXRCTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.27

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.19

1.76

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

1.49

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.31

-0.61

Drawdowns

LCTRX vs. RCTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTRX drawdown since its inception was -26.09%, which is greater than RCTIX's maximum drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTRX and RCTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTRXRCTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.09%

-10.89%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.17%

-1.20%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.33%

-1.48%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.82%

-6.17%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.93%

-10.89%

-13.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-1.08%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.36%

-0.08%

Volatility

LCTRX vs. RCTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) is 0.58%, while River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) has a volatility of 0.84%. This indicates that LCTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCTRXRCTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

0.84%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.46%

1.76%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91%

2.28%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.45%

2.49%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.31%

3.74%

+2.57%

LCTRX vs. RCTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTRX has a 2.33% expense ratio, which is higher than RCTIX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCTRX vs. RCTIX - Dividend Comparison

LCTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, less than RCTIX's 7.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
5.28%5.53%5.57%5.31%2.18%1.69%1.17%2.40%3.31%2.09%0.00%
RCTIX
River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund
7.27%7.31%7.89%8.50%5.98%3.02%5.97%4.97%3.30%4.89%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCTRX and RCTIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RCTIX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to LCTRX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTRX dropped -26.09% vs RCTIX's -10.89%.

LCTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCTRX and RCTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer