PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTD vs. NCLR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCTD vs. NCLR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LCTD is traded in USD, while NCLR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the NCLR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than NCLR.L's 15.68% return.


LCTD

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.33%
6M
8.97%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*

NCLR.L

1D
-5.41%
1M
-9.92%
YTD
15.68%
6M
17.68%
1Y
76.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTD vs. NCLR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and NCLR.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCTD vs. NCLR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTD
LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NCLR.L
NCLR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
NCLR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTD vs. NCLR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCTDNCLR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.26

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.54

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.39

6.10

+0.29

LCTD vs. NCLR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the NCLR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and NCLR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCTDNCLR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.56

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

2.35

-1.87

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. NCLR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, roughly equal to the maximum NCLR.L drawdown of -29.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and NCLR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTDNCLR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.82%

-29.77%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-29.77%

+18.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-19.71%

+16.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-8.78%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

12.44%

-9.41%

Volatility

LCTD vs. NCLR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is 4.31%, while WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF (NCLR.L) has a volatility of 14.65%. This indicates that LCTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NCLR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCTDNCLR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

14.65%

-10.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

35.59%

-23.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

48.50%

-33.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

49.13%

-32.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

49.13%

-33.07%

LCTD vs. NCLR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NCLR.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCTD vs. NCLR.L - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, while NCLR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
3.40%3.61%3.74%3.16%3.52%2.20%
NCLR.L
WisdomTree Uranium and Nuclear Energy UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCTD and NCLR.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCTD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCTD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for NCLR.L.

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LCTD and 0.45% for NCLR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCTD and NCLR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer