PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTD vs. INMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCTD vs. INMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than INMU's 1.73% return.


LCTD

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.33%
6M
8.97%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*

INMU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.98%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTD vs. INMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
6.33%30.42%3.14%17.10%-16.16%4.36%
INMU
BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF
1.73%5.52%2.77%6.50%-7.78%1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and INMU is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2021

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCTD vs. INMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTD
LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

INMU
INMU Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
INMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
INMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
INMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
INMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTD vs. INMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCTDINMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.65

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.79

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.39

9.53

-3.15

LCTD vs. INMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the INMU Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and INMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCTDINMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.87

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.50

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.60

-0.11

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. INMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, which is greater than INMU's maximum drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and INMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTDINMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.82%

-10.67%

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-2.58%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.59%

-4.88%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.82%

-10.67%

-19.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-0.66%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-2.81%

-3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

0.75%

+2.28%

Volatility

LCTD vs. INMU - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) at 0.81%. This indicates that LCTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCTDINMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

0.81%

+3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

1.88%

+10.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

2.51%

+12.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

3.60%

+12.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

3.54%

+12.52%

LCTD vs. INMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INMU's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCTD vs. INMU - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than INMU's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
INMU
BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF
3.36%3.48%3.47%3.44%1.92%1.14%
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
3.40%3.61%3.74%3.16%3.52%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCTD and INMU have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCTD has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to INMU (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTD dropped -29.82% vs INMU's -10.67%.

On 5-year performance, LCTD leads with 6.77% vs 1.78% for INMU. On fees, LCTD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, INMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LCTD has performed better with a 6.77% return vs 1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LCTD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for INMU.

LCTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 3.36% for INMU.

LCTD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while INMU is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LCTD and 0.30% for INMU.

INMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCTD and INMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer