LCTD vs. BRLN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LCTD (BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and BRLN (BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTD is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BRLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCTD returned 14.96%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for BRLN. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCTD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BRLN.

Performance

LCTD vs. BRLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than BRLN's 1.35% return.

LCTD

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 6M: 8.97%
• 1Y: 19.28%
• 3Y*: 14.96%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: —

BRLN

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 2.23%
• 1Y: 5.10%
• 3Y*: 7.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTD vs. BRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	6.33%	30.42%	3.14%	17.10%	11.96%
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF	1.35%	5.38%	7.49%	13.42%	2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and BRLN is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022	0.17

Return for Risk

LCTD vs. BRLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTD

LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 37
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 36
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 40

BRLN

BRLN Risk / Return Rank: 52
BRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
BRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTD vs. BRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCTD	BRLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	1.68	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	2.60	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.32	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	2.56	-0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.39	9.95	-3.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCTD vs. BRLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the BRLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and BRLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCTD	BRLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	1.68	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	2.19	-1.71

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. BRLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, which is greater than BRLN's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and BRLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCTD	BRLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.82%	-3.85%	-25.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.92%	-2.00%	-8.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.59%	-3.85%	-9.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.23%	-0.21%	-3.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.79%	-0.31%	-6.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	0.51%	+2.52%

Volatility

LCTD vs. BRLN - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) at 0.81%. This indicates that LCTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCTD	BRLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	0.81%	+3.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.99%	2.24%	+9.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.55%	3.06%	+11.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.14%	3.73%	+12.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.06%	3.73%	+12.33%

LCTD vs. BRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BRLN's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCTD vs. BRLN - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than BRLN's 6.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BRLN BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF	6.35%	6.50%	7.87%	9.06%	1.48%	0.00%
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	3.40%	3.61%	3.74%	3.16%	3.52%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCTD and BRLN in my portfolio?

LCTD and BRLN have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCTD or BRLN?

LCTD has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to BRLN (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTD dropped -29.82% vs BRLN's -3.85%.

Which ETF is better, LCTD or BRLN?

On 3-year performance, LCTD leads with 14.96% vs 7.36% for BRLN. On fees, LCTD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCTD or BRLN?

Over the 3-year period, LCTD has performed better with a 14.96% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCTD or BRLN?

LCTD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BRLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCTD or BRLN?

BRLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 3.40% for LCTD.

What is the main difference between LCTD and BRLN?

LCTD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while BRLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LCTD and 0.55% for BRLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.