LCSMX vs. LMGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) and ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX).
LCSMX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Jan 9, 2018. LMGTX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Apr 16, 1995.
Performance
LCSMX vs. LMGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCSMX vs. LMGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund | 11.23% | 51.52% | -13.60% | 16.26% | -27.25% | 4.73% | 35.72% | 6.81% | 1.42% |
LMGTX ClearBridge International Growth Fund | -4.31% | 21.83% | 6.39% | 13.17% | -21.97% | 2.93% | 23.55% | 30.01% | -13.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCSMX achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than LMGTX's -4.31% return.
LCSMX
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -12.34%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 6M
- 26.19%
- 1Y
- 63.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.71%
- 10Y*
- —
LMGTX
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- -4.31%
- 6M
- -4.42%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCSMX vs. LMGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCSMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LMGTX's 1.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCSMX vs. LMGTX — Risk / Return Rank
LCSMX
LMGTX
LCSMX vs. LMGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) and ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCSMX | LMGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.92 | 0.62 | +2.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 0.96 | +2.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.13 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 0.79 | +3.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.92 | 3.12 | +13.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCSMX | LMGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 0.62 | +2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.16 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.32 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCSMX and LMGTX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LCSMX vs. LMGTX - Dividend Comparison
LCSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than LMGTX's 8.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund | 0.90% | 1.00% | 1.29% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 3.03% | 0.48% | 0.88% | 1.40% |
LMGTX ClearBridge International Growth Fund | 8.16% | 7.81% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.07% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LCSMX vs. LMGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCSMX drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, smaller than the maximum LMGTX drawdown of -71.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCSMX and LMGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCSMX | LMGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.72% | -71.47% | +31.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.39% | -13.71% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.72% | -35.65% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.80% | -10.54% | -3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.97% | -16.56% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 3.48% | +0.26% |
Volatility
LCSMX vs. LMGTX - Volatility Comparison
Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) has a higher volatility of 12.00% compared to ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) at 9.24%. This indicates that LCSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCSMX | LMGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.00% | 9.24% | +2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.91% | 13.24% | +4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.02% | 18.88% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 17.47% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 17.20% | +2.15% |