PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCSIX vs. CURE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCSIX vs. CURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) and Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCSIX achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than CURE's -7.96% return. Over the past 10 years, LCSIX has underperformed CURE with an annualized return of 2.78%, while CURE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.49% annualized return.


LCSIX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.68%
YTD
2.32%
6M
1.03%
1Y
0.15%
3Y*
-1.68%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.78%

CURE

1D
-0.55%
1M
17.48%
YTD
-7.96%
6M
-6.00%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCSIX vs. CURE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
2.32%1.13%-8.29%-3.07%6.04%14.90%9.90%-5.97%15.16%6.19%
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
-7.96%22.55%-8.47%-9.40%-20.51%88.30%5.02%55.66%2.82%69.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LCSIX and CURE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2012

-0.03

The correlation between LCSIX and CURE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCSIX vs. CURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCSIX
LCSIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
LCSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
LCSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CURE
CURE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCSIX vs. CURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) and Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCSIXCUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.13

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

0.85

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.68

1.94

-1.26

LCSIX vs. CURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the CURE Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCSIX and CURE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCSIX vs. CURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCSIX drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum CURE drawdown of -69.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCSIX and CURE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCSIXCUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-69.19%

+44.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.87%

-31.10%

+27.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.60%

-51.93%

+40.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

-52.23%

+39.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.54%

-69.19%

+55.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.15%

-26.94%

+17.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-18.16%

+11.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

13.71%

-11.67%

Volatility

LCSIX vs. CURE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund (LCSIX) is 1.25%, while Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) has a volatility of 14.30%. This indicates that LCSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCSIXCUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

14.30%

-13.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.11%

30.87%

-25.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.20%

44.32%

-38.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.51%

43.84%

-38.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.67%

49.59%

-42.92%

LCSIX vs. CURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CURE's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCSIX vs. CURE - Dividend Comparison

LCSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than CURE's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
1.16%1.12%1.17%2.02%0.38%0.02%0.17%0.40%0.70%0.18%0.00%0.00%
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
2.27%2.32%2.75%1.88%10.75%7.14%2.94%0.54%12.36%0.02%3.21%7.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCSIX and CURE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CURE has higher volatility (14.30%) compared to LCSIX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCSIX dropped -25.13% vs CURE's -69.19%.

CURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCSIX and CURE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer