LCRYX vs. TCPYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LCRYX (Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund) and TCPYX (Touchstone Impact Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, LCRYX returned 1.63%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for TCPYX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCRYX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for TCPYX.

Performance

LCRYX vs. TCPYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) and Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCRYX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than TCPYX's 0.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LCRYX having a 1.63% annualized return and TCPYX not far behind at 1.57%.

LCRYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 5.59%
• 3Y*: 4.12%
• 5Y*: -0.01%
• 10Y*: 1.63%

TCPYX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 0.53%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: 5.49%
• 3Y*: 4.11%
• 5Y*: 0.10%
• 10Y*: 1.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCRYX vs. TCPYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCRYX Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund	0.44%	7.36%	1.33%	5.55%	-14.16%	-0.69%	8.21%	8.10%	-0.28%	3.46%
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund	0.53%	6.75%	1.77%	5.32%	-13.07%	-1.01%	6.72%	7.91%	0.16%	3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between LCRYX and TCPYX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009	0.89

The correlation between LCRYX and TCPYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LCRYX vs. TCPYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCRYX

LCRYX Risk / Return Rank: 24
LCRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
LCRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
LCRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
LCRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
LCRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

TCPYX

TCPYX Risk / Return Rank: 25
TCPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
TCPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
TCPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TCPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
TCPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCRYX vs. TCPYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) and Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCRYX	TCPYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.42	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.16	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.26	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	1.93	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.48	5.85	-0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCRYX vs. TCPYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCRYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the TCPYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCRYX and TCPYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCRYX	TCPYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	1.42	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.02	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.33	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.69	+0.05

Drawdowns

LCRYX vs. TCPYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCRYX drawdown since its inception was -18.82%, roughly equal to the maximum TCPYX drawdown of -18.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCRYX and TCPYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCRYX	TCPYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.82%	-18.12%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.05%	-2.92%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.77%	-5.79%	+0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.82%	-18.12%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.82%	-18.12%	-0.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.18%	-1.98%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-3.22%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	0.96%	+0.06%

Volatility

LCRYX vs. TCPYX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund (LCRYX) and Touchstone Impact Bond Fund (TCPYX) have volatilities of 1.43% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCRYX	TCPYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	1.48%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.88%	2.84%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.99%	3.98%	+0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.76%	5.90%	-0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.79%	4.84%	-0.05%

LCRYX vs. TCPYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCRYX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than TCPYX's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCRYX vs. TCPYX - Dividend Comparison

LCRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than TCPYX's 3.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCRYX Lord Abbett Core Fixed Income Fund	4.72%	4.68%	3.96%	4.16%	2.43%	1.91%	5.45%	2.73%	3.27%	2.48%	2.56%	2.93%
TCPYX Touchstone Impact Bond Fund	3.93%	3.52%	3.68%	3.22%	2.63%	1.91%	2.13%	2.63%	2.86%	2.77%	2.98%	2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCRYX and TCPYX in my portfolio?

LCRYX and TCPYX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCRYX or TCPYX?

TCPYX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to LCRYX (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCRYX dropped -18.82% vs TCPYX's -18.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TCPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.