PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LCRP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
1.41%
5Y*
-0.92%
10Y*
1.61%

XZBU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%-1.12%0.56%4.59%-16.57%-0.11%-0.96%
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
34.27%0.67%2.68%2.98%-8.73%-0.87%-2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LCRP.L and XZBU.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between LCRP.L and XZBU.L has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCRP.L
LCRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LCRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XZBU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCRP.LXZBU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCRP.LXZBU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

Drawdowns

LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCRP.LXZBU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

Volatility

LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCRP.LXZBU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.86%

LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCRP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XZBU.L's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Dividend Comparison

LCRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, while XZBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.75%5.64%5.14%4.64%4.37%3.29%3.49%
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCRP.L and XZBU.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCRP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCRP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XZBU.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCRP.L and 0.16% for XZBU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCRP.L and XZBU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer