LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L
LCRP.L (SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and XZBU.L (Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C) are both Corporate Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, from State Street and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCRP.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for XZBU.L.
Performance
LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCRP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -1.82%
- 1Y
- 6.35%
- 3Y*
- 1.41%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
XZBU.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCRP.L SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | -1.12% | 0.56% | 4.59% | -16.57% | -0.11% | -0.96% |
XZBU.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C | 34.27% | 0.67% | 2.68% | 2.98% | -8.73% | -0.87% | -2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCRP.L and XZBU.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020 | 0.92 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LCRP.L and XZBU.L has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L — Risk / Return Rank
LCRP.L
XZBU.L
LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCRP.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCRP.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | — | — |
Drawdowns
LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCRP.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.73% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.80% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | — | — |
Volatility
LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCRP.L | XZBU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.08% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.04% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.86% | — | — |
LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCRP.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XZBU.L's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCRP.L vs. XZBU.L - Dividend Comparison
LCRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, while XZBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCRP.L SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 2.75% | 5.64% | 5.14% | 4.64% | 4.37% | 3.29% | 3.49% |
XZBU.L Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCRP.L and XZBU.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCRP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCRP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XZBU.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCRP.L and 0.16% for XZBU.L.
Find the right allocation for LCRP.L and XZBU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer