PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCR vs. LMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCR vs. LMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LCR vs. LMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LCR
Leuthold Core ETF
-2.16%12.43%8.68%12.80%-7.58%12.12%13.28%
LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF
0.66%7.05%5.15%6.10%-3.07%-0.91%1.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCR achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly lower than LMBS's 0.66% return.


LCR

1D
1.65%
1M
-4.26%
YTD
-2.16%
6M
-0.55%
1Y
10.25%
3Y*
9.58%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*

LMBS

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
0.66%
6M
2.10%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
2.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCR vs. LMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LMBS's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LCR vs. LMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCR
LCR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCR Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

LMBS
LMBS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCR vs. LMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCRLMBSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.14

2.18

-1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.66

2.91

-1.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.47

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

3.25

-1.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.96

13.96

-7.00

LCR vs. LMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the LMBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCR and LMBS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCRLMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.18

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

1.16

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.13

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between LCR and LMBS is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LCR vs. LMBS - Dividend Comparison

LCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than LMBS's 4.10% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCR
Leuthold Core ETF
1.40%1.37%1.86%1.60%0.75%0.21%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF
4.10%4.08%4.28%3.96%2.22%2.04%2.27%2.55%2.76%2.73%2.84%3.03%

Drawdowns

LCR vs. LMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCR drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, which is greater than LMBS's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCR and LMBS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LCRLMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-6.49%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-1.72%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.40%

-6.16%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-0.91%

-3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-0.81%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

0.40%

+1.12%

Volatility

LCR vs. LMBS - Volatility Comparison

Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) has a higher volatility of 3.51% compared to First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) at 0.88%. This indicates that LCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LCRLMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

0.88%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

1.37%

+4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

2.57%

+6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.08%

2.55%

+6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.49%

2.38%

+9.11%