PortfoliosLab logo
LMBS vs. USFR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LMBS and USFR is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LMBS vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LMBS:

2.16

USFR:

15.35

Sortino Ratio

LMBS:

2.98

USFR:

46.48

Omega Ratio

LMBS:

1.45

USFR:

11.77

Calmar Ratio

LMBS:

3.49

USFR:

80.79

Martin Ratio

LMBS:

10.61

USFR:

643.74

Ulcer Index

LMBS:

0.57%

USFR:

0.01%

Daily Std Dev

LMBS:

2.83%

USFR:

0.32%

Max Drawdown

LMBS:

-6.49%

USFR:

-1.36%

Current Drawdown

LMBS:

-0.65%

USFR:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMBS achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LMBS has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 2.60%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.46% annualized return.


LMBS

YTD

1.80%

1M

1.09%

6M

2.49%

1Y

6.09%

5Y*

1.97%

10Y*

2.60%

USFR

YTD

1.53%

1M

0.39%

6M

2.28%

1Y

4.80%

5Y*

2.82%

10Y*

2.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LMBS vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMBS has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LMBS vs. USFR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMBS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMBS is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of USFR is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of USFR is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of USFR is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of USFR is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of USFR is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of USFR is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LMBS vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LMBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 15.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMBS and USFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LMBS vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

LMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than USFR's 4.76% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF
4.19%4.28%3.96%2.22%2.04%2.27%2.55%2.76%2.73%2.84%3.03%0.37%
USFR
WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund
4.76%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.02%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LMBS vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMBS drawdown since its inception was -6.49%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMBS and USFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LMBS vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.10%. This indicates that LMBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...