PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCR vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCR vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LCR vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LCR
Leuthold Core ETF
-1.75%12.43%8.68%12.80%-7.58%12.12%13.28%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
24.50%8.07%5.97%-5.63%10.15%12.34%7.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCR achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 24.50% return.


LCR

1D
0.42%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
-1.75%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
10.83%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.35%
1M
7.76%
YTD
24.50%
6M
22.58%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
10.43%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCR vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LCR vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCR
LCR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
LCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCR Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
LCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCR vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCRFAARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

2.00

-0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

2.69

-0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.57

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.95

7.53

-0.58

LCR vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCR and FAAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCRFAARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.00

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.72

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.45

+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between LCR and FAAR is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LCR vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

LCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than FAAR's 9.24% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCR
Leuthold Core ETF
1.39%1.37%1.86%1.60%0.75%0.21%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.24%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%

Drawdowns

LCR vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCR drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, roughly equal to the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCR and FAAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LCRFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-18.03%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

-11.54%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.40%

-18.03%

+4.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.07%

-0.86%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-7.97%

+5.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

3.93%

-2.39%

Volatility

LCR vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) is 3.40%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that LCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LCRFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

5.66%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

10.65%

-4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

15.32%

-6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.08%

13.00%

-3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.49%

11.54%

-0.05%