PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCORX vs. GIPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCORX vs. GIPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leuthold Core Investment Fund (LCORX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCORX achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly higher than GIPIX's 5.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LCORX has outperformed GIPIX with an annualized return of 8.08%, while GIPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.16% annualized return.


LCORX

1D
0.54%
1M
3.16%
YTD
7.29%
6M
8.36%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
12.94%
5Y*
7.46%
10Y*
8.08%

GIPIX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.79%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.79%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
10.66%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
6.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCORX vs. GIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCORX
Leuthold Core Investment Fund
7.29%14.39%8.01%11.71%-6.78%15.19%10.08%11.58%-6.23%15.79%
GIPIX
Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio
5.42%10.80%8.51%12.49%-14.43%7.94%11.09%15.68%-6.52%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between LCORX and GIPIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.76

The correlation between LCORX and GIPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCORX vs. GIPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCORX
LCORX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LCORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCORX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LCORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCORX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GIPIX
GIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCORX vs. GIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Core Investment Fund (LCORX) and Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCORXGIPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.45

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.72

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

11.88

-1.23

LCORX vs. GIPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCORX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the GIPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCORX and GIPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCORXGIPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.34

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.59

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.76

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.67

+0.06

Drawdowns

LCORX vs. GIPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCORX drawdown since its inception was -41.31%, which is greater than GIPIX's maximum drawdown of -29.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCORX and GIPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCORXGIPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.31%

-29.46%

-11.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-5.59%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.98%

-9.11%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.88%

-20.65%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.38%

-20.65%

+1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-3.68%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.27%

+0.43%

Volatility

LCORX vs. GIPIX - Volatility Comparison

Leuthold Core Investment Fund (LCORX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio (GIPIX) at 2.18%. This indicates that LCORX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCORXGIPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

2.18%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.77%

5.32%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.46%

6.50%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.18%

8.00%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.68%

8.11%

+1.57%

LCORX vs. GIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCORX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than GIPIX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCORX vs. GIPIX - Dividend Comparison

LCORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than GIPIX's 5.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIPIX
Goldman Sachs Balanced Strategy Portfolio
5.51%5.22%4.06%2.12%4.56%6.37%2.25%2.51%4.70%4.51%1.46%5.73%
LCORX
Leuthold Core Investment Fund
7.41%7.93%7.03%5.57%7.20%5.00%0.24%1.89%10.74%3.22%0.45%3.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCORX and GIPIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCORX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to GIPIX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCORX dropped -41.31% vs GIPIX's -29.46%.

GIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCORX and GIPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer