LCO vs. NTSE
LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and NTSE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for NTSE.
Performance
LCO vs. NTSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCO
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSE
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 11.32%
- YTD
- 32.02%
- 6M
- 34.98%
- 1Y
- 64.08%
- 3Y*
- 25.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- —
LCO vs. NTSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 14.19% |
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 26.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCO and NTSE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCO vs. NTSE — Risk / Return Rank
LCO
NTSE
LCO vs. NTSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCO | NTSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 0.38 | +1.24 |
Drawdowns
LCO vs. NTSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, smaller than the maximum NTSE drawdown of -42.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and NTSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCO | NTSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -42.84% | +31.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.17% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -19.74% | +15.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.66% | — |
Volatility
LCO vs. NTSE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCO | NTSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.63% | 20.73% | +3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 19.26% | +5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 19.23% | +5.40% |
LCO vs. NTSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSE's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCO vs. NTSE - Dividend Comparison
LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund | 2.51% | 3.35% | 3.23% | 2.44% | 3.22% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCO and NTSE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.
NTSE has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.
They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 0.38% for NTSE.
Find the right allocation for LCO and NTSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer