LCO vs. AVMA
LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and AVMA (Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for AVMA.
Performance
LCO vs. AVMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCO
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVMA
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 10.19%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCO vs. AVMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 6.29% |
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF | 8.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCO and AVMA is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCO vs. AVMA — Risk / Return Rank
LCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVMA
LCO vs. AVMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCO | AVMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCO vs. AVMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, smaller than the maximum AVMA drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and AVMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCO | AVMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -11.81% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.12% | -1.15% | -6.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -1.54% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.53% | — |
Volatility
LCO vs. AVMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCO | AVMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.04% | 9.40% | +16.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.04% | 10.36% | +15.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.04% | 10.36% | +15.68% |
LCO vs. AVMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than AVMA's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCO vs. AVMA - Dividend Comparison
LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.02% | 2.21% | 2.28% | 1.11% |
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCO and AVMA have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVMA is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVMA is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.
AVMA has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.
They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 0.21% for AVMA.
Find the right allocation for LCO and AVMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer