LCO vs. ASET

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. LCO is actively managed, while ASET is passively managed. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.

Performance

LCO vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LCO

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCO vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF	9.60%
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%

Return for Risk

LCO vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

LCO vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and ASET.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCO	ASET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.20%	0.00%	-11.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.67%	0.00%	-3.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.49%	0.00%	-4.49%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LCO	ASET	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.73%	0.00%	+25.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.73%	0.00%	+25.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.73%	0.00%	+25.73%

LCO vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCO vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCO nor ASET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, LCO or ASET?

On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCO or ASET?

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCO or ASET?

LCO and ASET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LCO and ASET?

They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 0.57% for ASET.