PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCLAX vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCLAX vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Select Fund Class A (LCLAX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCLAX achieves a 5.32% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return. Over the past 10 years, LCLAX has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 16.58%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.


LCLAX

1D
-0.20%
1M
6.58%
YTD
5.32%
6M
5.01%
1Y
13.96%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
16.58%

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCLAX vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCLAX
ClearBridge Select Fund Class A
5.32%6.87%21.13%23.82%-33.28%19.86%58.29%33.03%10.18%38.69%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between LCLAX and XMMO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.83

The correlation between LCLAX and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCLAX vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCLAX
LCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
LCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCLAX vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Select Fund Class A (LCLAX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCLAXXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.35

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

4.45

-3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.16

18.21

-15.05

LCLAX vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCLAX and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCLAXXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

1.99

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.78

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.89

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.58

+0.07

Drawdowns

LCLAX vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCLAX drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCLAX and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCLAXXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.64%

-55.37%

+11.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.36%

-8.34%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.75%

-24.93%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.64%

-27.91%

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.64%

-36.74%

-6.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.09%

-9.45%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

2.04%

+2.63%

Volatility

LCLAX vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Select Fund Class A (LCLAX) is 3.12%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that LCLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCLAXXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

7.82%

-4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

15.54%

-4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

18.71%

-4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.78%

21.45%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.91%

22.27%

-0.36%

LCLAX vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCLAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCLAX vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

LCLAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCLAX
ClearBridge Select Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%3.38%0.00%0.00%1.31%2.15%1.13%5.31%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCLAX and XMMO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to LCLAX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCLAX dropped -43.64% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCLAX and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer