LCII vs. MSFT
LCII (LCI Industries) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. LCII operates in Recreational Vehicles (Consumer Cyclical), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, LCII returned 4.68%/yr vs 23.56%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LCII vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCII achieves a -20.88% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -24.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LCII has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 4.68%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.56% annualized return.
LCII
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -14.83%
- YTD
- -20.88%
- 6M
- -22.46%
- 1Y
- 7.84%
- 3Y*
- -3.18%
- 5Y*
- -2.70%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
MSFT
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -12.69%
- YTD
- -24.10%
- 6M
- -24.78%
- 1Y
- -24.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- 23.56%
LCII vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCII LCI Industries | -20.88% | 22.83% | -14.64% | 41.10% | -38.49% | 23.07% | 24.13% | 65.13% | -47.23% | 23.05% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -24.10% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCII and MSFT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1989 | 0.22 |
The correlation between LCII and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LCII:
$2.29B
MSFT:
$2.72T
LCII:
$7.63
MSFT:
$16.79
LCII:
12.33
MSFT:
21.77
LCII:
0.45
MSFT:
1.52
LCII:
0.56
MSFT:
8.56
LCII:
1.68
MSFT:
6.57
LCII:
$4.12B
MSFT:
$318.27B
LCII:
$980.30M
MSFT:
$217.41B
LCII:
$381.13M
MSFT:
$200.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCII vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
LCII
MSFT
LCII vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LCI Industries (LCII) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCII | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.84 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | -0.74 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.48 | -1.45 | +1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCII vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCII drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCII and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCII | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.55% | -69.38% | -18.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.76% | -33.91% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.76% | -33.91% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.19% | -37.15% | -10.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.89% | -37.15% | -16.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.90% | -32.15% | -6.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.26% | -21.79% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.41% | 17.20% | -0.79% |
Volatility
LCII vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
LCI Industries (LCII) has a higher volatility of 12.72% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 11.47%. This indicates that LCII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCII | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.72% | 11.47% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.86% | 23.03% | +3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.41% | 26.05% | +9.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.24% | 26.81% | +12.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.83% | 27.09% | +12.74% |
Dividends
LCII vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
LCII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than MSFT's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCII LCI Industries | 4.89% | 3.79% | 4.16% | 3.34% | 4.38% | 2.21% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 3.52% | 1.58% | 1.30% | 3.28% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.97% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Financials
LCII vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LCI Industries and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LCII vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison
LCII - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported a gross profit of 205.91M and revenue of 932.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.
MSFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
LCII - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported an operating income of 35.36M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
MSFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
LCII - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported a net income of 18.68M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
MSFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LCII and MSFT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCII has higher volatility (12.72%) compared to MSFT (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCII dropped -87.55% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
LCII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCII and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer