LCID vs. MUB
LCID (Lucid Group, Inc.) is a stock, while MUB (iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. Over the past 5 years, LCID returned -52.62%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for MUB. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LCID vs. MUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCID achieves a -45.88% return, which is significantly lower than MUB's 1.24% return.
LCID
- 1D
- -7.29%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- YTD
- -45.88%
- 6M
- -57.82%
- 1Y
- -73.88%
- 3Y*
- -55.75%
- 5Y*
- -52.62%
- 10Y*
- —
MUB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
LCID vs. MUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCID Lucid Group, Inc. | -45.88% | -65.00% | -28.27% | -38.36% | -82.05% | 280.12% | 1.21% |
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 1.24% | 3.78% | 1.26% | 5.56% | -7.34% | 1.02% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCID and MUB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2020 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCID vs. MUB — Risk / Return Rank
LCID
MUB
LCID vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCID | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.50 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 2.50 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 8.85 | -10.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCID | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 | 2.39 | -3.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 | 0.21 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.45 | 0.58 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
LCID vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCID drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCID and MUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCID | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -13.68% | -85.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.08% | -2.79% | -79.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.09% | -5.34% | -87.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.99% | -11.88% | -87.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.01% | -0.70% | -98.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.00% | -2.23% | -73.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.65% | 0.79% | +53.86% |
Volatility
LCID vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison
Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) has a higher volatility of 18.88% compared to iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) at 0.97%. This indicates that LCID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCID | MUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.88% | 0.97% | +17.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.48% | 2.22% | +48.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.33% | 2.92% | +73.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.56% | 4.06% | +77.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.78% | 4.92% | +81.86% |
Dividends
LCID vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison
LCID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCID Lucid Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF | 3.17% | 3.14% | 3.01% | 2.65% | 2.11% | 1.81% | 2.11% | 2.42% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.21% | 2.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCID and MUB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCID has higher volatility (18.88%) compared to MUB (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCID dropped -99.03% vs MUB's -13.68%.
MUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCID and MUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer