PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCID vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LCID vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCID achieves a -49.29% return, which is significantly lower than META's -12.40% return.


LCID

1D
4.28%
1M
-5.63%
YTD
-49.29%
6M
-54.65%
1Y
-75.86%
3Y*
-56.43%
5Y*
-53.01%
10Y*

META

1D
1.70%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
-12.40%
6M
-12.22%
1Y
-16.77%
3Y*
27.49%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
17.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCID vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
-49.29%-65.00%-28.27%-38.36%-82.05%280.12%-2.34%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-12.40%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%7.20%

Correlation

The correlation between LCID and META is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020

0.28

The correlation between LCID and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LCID:

$17.60B

META:

$1.48T

EPS

LCID:

-$3.19

META:

$27.47

PS Ratio

LCID:

5.05

META:

6.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

LCID:

$1.12B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LCID:

-$1.62B

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

LCID:

-$3.03B

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCID vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCID
LCID Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
LCID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCID Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCID Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LCID Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCID Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCID vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCIDMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.94

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

-0.51

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

-1.03

-0.30

LCID vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCID Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCID and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCID vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCID drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCID and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCIDMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.19%

-76.74%

-22.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.98%

-33.30%

-51.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.21%

-34.15%

-60.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.15%

-76.74%

-22.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.08%

-26.69%

-72.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.30%

-15.84%

-60.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.36%

16.38%

+40.98%

Volatility

LCID vs. META - Volatility Comparison

Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) has a higher volatility of 22.77% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 12.77%. This indicates that LCID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCIDMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.77%

12.77%

+10.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.03%

27.88%

+24.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.04%

36.16%

+41.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.64%

44.16%

+37.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

86.75%

38.74%

+48.01%

Dividends

LCID vs. META - Dividend Comparison

LCID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024
LCID
Lucid Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.36%0.32%0.34%

Financials

LCID vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lucid Group, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B202220232024202520260
56.31B
(LCID) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LCID and META have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCID has higher volatility (22.77%) compared to META (12.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCID dropped -99.19% vs META's -76.74%.

META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCID and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer