PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCIAX vs. SMSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCIAX vs. SMSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCIAX achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than SMSAX's 6.12% return. Over the past 10 years, LCIAX has outperformed SMSAX with an annualized return of 14.76%, while SMSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.60% annualized return.


LCIAX

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.10%
6M
7.90%
YTD
9.98%
1Y
21.05%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
14.76%
ALL TIME*
10.17%

SMSAX

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.03%
6M
4.04%
YTD
6.12%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
4.60%
ALL TIME*
3.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LCIAX vs. SMSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCIAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund
9.98%17.33%23.90%26.51%-19.27%26.29%20.85%31.37%-5.10%21.59%
SMSAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund
6.12%10.62%6.42%7.21%-4.95%1.47%12.06%4.85%-3.68%5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between LCIAX and SMSAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2010

0.72

The correlation between LCIAX and SMSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCIAX vs. SMSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCIAX
LCIAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LCIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LCIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SMSAX
SMSAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SMSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SMSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCIAX vs. SMSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCIAXSMSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.41

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.34

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

13.64

-4.24

LCIAX vs. SMSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the SMSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCIAX and SMSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCIAX vs. SMSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCIAX drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than SMSAX's maximum drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCIAX and SMSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCIAXSMSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.93%

-10.98%

-46.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-3.66%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-5.93%

-20.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.32%

-8.79%

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.54%

-10.98%

-23.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.40%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.81%

-2.09%

-7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

0.89%

+1.15%

Volatility

LCIAX vs. SMSAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund (SMSAX) at 1.26%. This indicates that LCIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCIAXSMSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

1.26%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

4.61%

+5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

5.69%

+7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

4.74%

+15.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

4.65%

+15.12%

LCIAX vs. SMSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCIAX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than SMSAX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCIAX vs. SMSAX - Dividend Comparison

LCIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.15%, more than SMSAX's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCIAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund
14.15%15.51%14.83%13.13%16.71%9.30%2.67%18.94%19.92%4.15%3.17%5.35%
SMSAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative Fund
4.79%5.08%5.54%4.35%2.13%7.61%2.79%1.01%4.94%2.20%0.07%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCIAX and SMSAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCIAX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to SMSAX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCIAX dropped -57.93% vs SMSAX's -10.98%.

SMSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCIAX and SMSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer