LCIAX vs. FLCKX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LCIAX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund) and FLCKX (Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LCIAX returned 14.61%/yr vs 14.56%/yr for FLCKX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LCIAX charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FLCKX.

Performance

LCIAX vs. FLCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCIAX achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly lower than FLCKX's 11.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LCIAX having a 14.61% annualized return and FLCKX not far behind at 14.56%.

LCIAX

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: -0.72%
• 6M: 7.81%
• YTD: 9.31%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 18.55%
• 5Y*: 11.81%
• 10Y*: 14.61%
• ALL TIME*: 10.14%

FLCKX

• 1D: 4.21%
• 1M: -5.26%
• 6M: 8.35%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 1Y: 18.09%
• 3Y*: 21.21%
• 5Y*: 12.27%
• 10Y*: 14.56%
• ALL TIME*: 9.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLCKX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LCIAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LCIAX vs. FLCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCIAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund	9.31%	17.33%	23.90%	26.51%	-19.27%	26.29%	20.85%	31.37%	-5.10%	21.59%
FLCKX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K	11.95%	20.45%	27.06%	26.21%	-22.91%	26.19%	26.85%	35.76%	-16.34%	20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LCIAX and FLCKX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008	0.91

The correlation between LCIAX and FLCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LCIAX vs. FLCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCIAX

LCIAX Risk / Return Rank: 53
LCIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
LCIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LCIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
LCIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
LCIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FLCKX

FLCKX Risk / Return Rank: 19
FLCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
FLCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
FLCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FLCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FLCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCIAX vs. FLCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCIAX	FLCKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	0.64	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	1.01	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.13	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	1.02	+1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.83	3.59	+5.24

LCIAX vs. FLCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the FLCKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCIAX and FLCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCIAX vs. FLCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCIAX drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, smaller than the maximum FLCKX drawdown of -69.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCIAX and FLCKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCIAX	FLCKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.93%	-69.99%	+12.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.81%	-15.43%	+6.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.32%	-28.52%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.32%	-28.52%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.54%	-44.10%	+9.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-11.88%	+10.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.81%	-12.36%	+2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	4.39%	-2.35%

Volatility

LCIAX vs. FLCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) is 3.38%, while Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that LCIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCIAX	FLCKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	9.28%	-5.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.05%	20.57%	-10.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.90%	24.59%	-11.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.24%	23.54%	-3.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.77%	23.61%	-3.84%

LCIAX vs. FLCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCIAX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCKX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCIAX vs. FLCKX - Dividend Comparison

LCIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.23%, more than FLCKX's 4.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCKX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K	4.19%	4.69%	14.54%	12.22%	18.51%	8.45%	0.19%	0.14%	19.95%	18.97%	27.57%	6.18%
LCIAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund	14.23%	15.51%	14.83%	13.13%	16.71%	9.30%	2.67%	18.94%	19.92%	4.15%	3.17%	5.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCIAX and FLCKX in my portfolio?

LCIAX and FLCKX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCIAX or FLCKX?

FLCKX has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to LCIAX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCIAX dropped -57.93% vs FLCKX's -69.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.