PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCIAX vs. LDRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCIAX vs. LDRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCIAX achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than LDRAX's 0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LCIAX has outperformed LDRAX with an annualized return of 15.25%, while LDRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return.


LCIAX

1D
0.19%
1M
5.71%
YTD
11.40%
6M
11.48%
1Y
28.21%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
15.25%

LDRAX

1D
0.17%
1M
1.67%
YTD
0.60%
6M
-0.31%
1Y
7.06%
3Y*
2.51%
5Y*
-3.12%
10Y*
1.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCIAX vs. LDRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCIAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund
11.40%17.33%23.90%26.51%-19.27%26.29%20.85%31.37%-5.10%21.59%
LDRAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund
0.60%6.81%-3.28%7.16%-27.73%-2.19%18.23%21.19%-5.16%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LCIAX and LDRAX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

-0.18

The correlation between LCIAX and LDRAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCIAX vs. LDRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCIAX
LCIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LCIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
LCIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LDRAX
LDRAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LDRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCIAX vs. LDRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCIAXLDRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.16

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.36

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.30

3.42

+11.87

LCIAX vs. LDRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the LDRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCIAX and LDRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCIAXLDRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

0.91

+1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

-0.25

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.13

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.13

+0.36

Drawdowns

LCIAX vs. LDRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCIAX drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than LDRAX's maximum drawdown of -37.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCIAX and LDRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCIAXLDRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.93%

-37.23%

-20.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-5.34%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-14.49%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.32%

-36.35%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.54%

-37.23%

+2.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-22.37%

+22.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-12.39%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.12%

-0.22%

Volatility

LCIAX vs. LDRAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX) at 2.65%. This indicates that LCIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCIAXLDRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.65%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

5.70%

+3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

8.06%

+3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

12.54%

+7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

11.39%

+8.38%

LCIAX vs. LDRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCIAX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than LDRAX's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCIAX vs. LDRAX - Dividend Comparison

LCIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.97%, more than LDRAX's 5.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCIAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund
13.97%15.51%14.83%13.13%16.71%9.30%2.67%18.94%19.92%4.15%3.17%5.35%
LDRAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund
5.15%5.04%4.62%3.42%3.23%4.30%12.32%8.60%4.80%4.46%6.21%9.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCIAX and LDRAX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCIAX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to LDRAX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCIAX dropped -57.93% vs LDRAX's -37.23%.

LCIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCIAX and LDRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer