LCIAX vs. FGLGX
LCIAX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund) and FGLGX (Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LCIAX returned 15.25%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for FGLGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCIAX charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FGLGX.
Performance
LCIAX vs. FGLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCIAX achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than FGLGX's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, LCIAX has underperformed FGLGX with an annualized return of 15.25%, while FGLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.45% annualized return.
LCIAX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 11.40%
- 6M
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- 28.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.26%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.25%
FGLGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 32.08%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- 16.96%
- 10Y*
- 16.45%
LCIAX vs. FGLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCIAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund | 11.40% | 17.33% | 23.90% | 26.51% | -19.27% | 26.29% | 20.85% | 31.37% | -5.10% | 21.59% |
FGLGX Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund | 10.11% | 28.57% | 27.45% | 24.80% | -7.23% | 26.53% | 10.01% | 32.37% | -8.95% | 16.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCIAX and FGLGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2012 | 0.92 |
The correlation between LCIAX and FGLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCIAX vs. FGLGX — Risk / Return Rank
LCIAX
FGLGX
LCIAX vs. FGLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCIAX | FGLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.49 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 3.50 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.30 | 16.03 | -0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCIAX | FGLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 2.70 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 1.01 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.90 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.88 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
LCIAX vs. FGLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCIAX drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than FGLGX's maximum drawdown of -36.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCIAX and FGLGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCIAX | FGLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.93% | -36.42% | -21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -9.43% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.32% | -18.75% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.32% | -21.21% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.54% | -36.42% | +1.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.24% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -3.78% | -6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 2.06% | -0.16% |
Volatility
LCIAX vs. FGLGX - Volatility Comparison
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCIAX | FGLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 2.89% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 9.34% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 12.27% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 16.89% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 18.37% | +1.40% |
LCIAX vs. FGLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCIAX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FGLGX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCIAX vs. FGLGX - Dividend Comparison
LCIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.97%, more than FGLGX's 8.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGLGX Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund | 8.94% | 9.84% | 7.99% | 5.29% | 6.55% | 9.22% | 5.36% | 7.25% | 12.29% | 4.61% | 1.69% | 5.94% |
LCIAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund | 13.97% | 15.51% | 14.83% | 13.13% | 16.71% | 9.30% | 2.67% | 18.94% | 19.92% | 4.15% | 3.17% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, LCIAX and FGLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FGLGX has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to LCIAX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCIAX dropped -57.93% vs FGLGX's -36.42%.
FGLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCIAX and FGLGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer