PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCIAX vs. CAVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCIAX vs. CAVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCIAX achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than CAVAX's 9.85% return. Over the past 10 years, LCIAX has outperformed CAVAX with an annualized return of 15.25%, while CAVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.15% annualized return.


LCIAX

1D
0.19%
1M
5.71%
YTD
11.40%
6M
11.48%
1Y
28.21%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
15.25%

CAVAX

1D
0.49%
1M
4.43%
YTD
9.85%
6M
10.48%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCIAX vs. CAVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCIAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund
11.40%17.33%23.90%26.51%-19.27%26.29%20.85%31.37%-5.10%21.59%
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
9.85%15.45%16.72%21.33%-18.51%20.57%17.33%26.63%-10.24%23.69%

Correlation

The correlation between LCIAX and CAVAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.96

The correlation between LCIAX and CAVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCIAX vs. CAVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCIAX
LCIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LCIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
LCIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CAVAX
CAVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CAVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CAVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCIAX vs. CAVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCIAXCAVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.35

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.74

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.30

11.65

+3.65

LCIAX vs. CAVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the CAVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCIAX and CAVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCIAXCAVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.97

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.57

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.70

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.69

-0.19

Drawdowns

LCIAX vs. CAVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCIAX drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than CAVAX's maximum drawdown of -36.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCIAX and CAVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCIAXCAVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.93%

-36.55%

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-8.49%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-17.95%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.32%

-26.51%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.54%

-36.55%

+2.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-5.06%

-4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.99%

-0.09%

Volatility

LCIAX vs. CAVAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund (LCIAX) and SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund (CAVAX) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCIAXCAVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.91%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

8.90%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.93%

11.81%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.14%

16.08%

+4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

17.39%

+2.38%

LCIAX vs. CAVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCIAX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CAVAX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCIAX vs. CAVAX - Dividend Comparison

LCIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.97%, more than CAVAX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAVAX
SEI Catholic Values Trust Catholic Values Equity Fund
6.13%6.73%7.01%1.29%3.67%16.58%2.98%2.80%5.66%0.71%0.99%0.00%
LCIAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Index Fund
13.97%15.51%14.83%13.13%16.71%9.30%2.67%18.94%19.92%4.15%3.17%5.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, LCIAX and CAVAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CAVAX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to LCIAX (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCIAX dropped -57.93% vs CAVAX's -36.55%.

LCIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCIAX and CAVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer