LCGFX vs. SWISX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LCGFX (William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund) and SWISX (Schwab International Index Fund) are both mutual funds - LCGFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by William Blair, while SWISX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, LCGFX returned 15.71%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for SWISX. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LCGFX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SWISX.

Performance

LCGFX vs. SWISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCGFX achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than SWISX's 12.67% return. Over the past 10 years, LCGFX has outperformed SWISX with an annualized return of 15.71%, while SWISX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.

LCGFX

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -0.36%
• 6M: 2.34%
• YTD: 0.27%
• 1Y: 4.66%
• 3Y*: 15.69%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: 15.71%
• ALL TIME*: 7.11%

SWISX

• 1D: 2.76%
• 1M: 2.05%
• 6M: 7.22%
• YTD: 12.67%
• 1Y: 26.17%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: 9.58%
• ALL TIME*: 5.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LCGFX William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SWISX Schwab International Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LCGFX vs. SWISX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LCGFX William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund	0.27%	11.79%	26.09%	40.48%	-32.48%	28.29%	36.64%	36.44%	5.18%	31.29%
SWISX Schwab International Index Fund	12.67%	31.59%	3.54%	18.13%	-14.30%	11.25%	8.14%	21.87%	-13.38%	25.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LCGFX and SWISX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 1999	0.67

The correlation between LCGFX and SWISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LCGFX vs. SWISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCGFX

LCGFX Risk / Return Rank: 6
LCGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
LCGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
LCGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LCGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
LCGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

SWISX

SWISX Risk / Return Rank: 69
SWISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SWISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SWISX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
SWISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SWISX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCGFX vs. SWISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCGFX	SWISX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	1.57	-1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	2.25	-1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.28	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.12	2.19	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	8.31	-7.98

LCGFX vs. SWISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCGFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the SWISX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCGFX and SWISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCGFX vs. SWISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCGFX drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, roughly equal to the maximum SWISX drawdown of -60.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCGFX and SWISX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCGFX	SWISX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.95%	-60.65%	-2.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.59%	-11.39%	-9.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.83%	-13.68%	-10.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.25%	-29.42%	-7.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.25%	-33.83%	-3.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.89%	0.00%	-5.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.38%	-14.73%	-6.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.66%	3.00%	+4.66%

Volatility

LCGFX vs. SWISX - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and Schwab International Index Fund (SWISX) have volatilities of 4.57% and 4.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCGFX	SWISX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	4.74%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.89%	13.54%	-0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	15.90%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.93%	16.43%	+5.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.34%	16.63%	+4.71%

LCGFX vs. SWISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCGFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SWISX's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCGFX vs. SWISX - Dividend Comparison

LCGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.54%, more than SWISX's 3.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCGFX William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund	8.54%	8.56%	5.97%	0.00%	0.82%	4.29%	3.83%	6.46%	17.08%	0.56%	1.10%	9.86%
SWISX Schwab International Index Fund	3.15%	3.55%	3.29%	3.31%	2.73%	3.34%	1.88%	3.09%	3.15%	2.71%	3.19%	2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCGFX and SWISX in my portfolio?

LCGFX and SWISX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCGFX or SWISX?

SWISX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to LCGFX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCGFX dropped -62.95% vs SWISX's -60.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SWISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.