LCFYX vs. FISCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) and Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX).
LCFYX is managed by Lord Abbett. It was launched on Jun 29, 2003. FISCX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 14, 1987.
Performance
LCFYX vs. FISCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCFYX vs. FISCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCFYX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund | 1.76% | 22.27% | 13.91% | 7.25% | -23.24% | 1.34% | 64.36% | 24.25% | -5.76% | 16.78% |
FISCX Franklin Convertible Securities Fund | -3.19% | 13.63% | 16.62% | 9.96% | -15.95% | -5.70% | 46.28% | 33.99% | 4.15% | 17.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCFYX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than FISCX's -3.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LCFYX having a 11.72% annualized return and FISCX not far behind at 11.24%.
LCFYX
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
FISCX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- -3.19%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 13.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCFYX vs. FISCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCFYX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FISCX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCFYX vs. FISCX — Risk / Return Rank
LCFYX
FISCX
LCFYX vs. FISCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) and Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCFYX | FISCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 1.06 | +0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.45 | 1.50 | +0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.21 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 1.51 | +1.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.50 | 6.28 | +6.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCFYX | FISCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 1.06 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.16 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.84 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.78 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCFYX and FISCX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LCFYX vs. FISCX - Dividend Comparison
LCFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than FISCX's 10.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCFYX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund | 1.53% | 1.88% | 2.31% | 2.06% | 2.73% | 18.40% | 16.22% | 8.76% | 4.99% | 2.54% | 3.72% | 3.48% |
FISCX Franklin Convertible Securities Fund | 10.23% | 9.94% | 4.87% | 2.22% | 8.70% | 8.10% | 11.30% | 16.05% | 7.09% | 7.68% | 4.62% | 4.68% |
Drawdowns
LCFYX vs. FISCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCFYX drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum FISCX drawdown of -49.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCFYX and FISCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCFYX | FISCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | -49.16% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.06% | -7.45% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.74% | -34.37% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.42% | -34.37% | +0.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -6.38% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -6.93% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.79% | +0.17% |
Volatility
LCFYX vs. FISCX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) at 4.43%. This indicates that LCFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FISCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCFYX | FISCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 4.43% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | 8.34% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 12.13% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.85% | 12.44% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 13.42% | +0.07% |