LCF vs. WEBS
LCF (Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF) and WEBS (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - LCF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Touchstone, while WEBS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%). LCF is actively managed, while WEBS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCF returned 17.35%/yr vs -49.47%/yr for WEBS. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. LCF charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for WEBS.
Performance
LCF vs. WEBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly higher than WEBS's -16.82% return.
LCF
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 4.06%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEBS
- 1D
- 5.89%
- 1M
- -13.46%
- YTD
- -16.82%
- 6M
- -14.14%
- 1Y
- -30.71%
- 3Y*
- -49.47%
- 5Y*
- -36.70%
- 10Y*
- —
LCF vs. WEBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF | 4.06% | 17.20% | 20.71% | 26.20% | -5.21% |
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares | -16.82% | -40.66% | -56.62% | -75.58% | 8.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCF and WEBS is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2022 | -0.83 |
The correlation between LCF and WEBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCF vs. WEBS — Risk / Return Rank
LCF
WEBS
LCF vs. WEBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCF | WEBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.94 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | -0.58 | +2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | -1.33 | +8.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCF | WEBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | -0.54 | +2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | -0.59 | +1.62 |
Drawdowns
LCF vs. WEBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum WEBS drawdown of -99.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and WEBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCF | WEBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.28% | -99.63% | +81.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -53.54% | +41.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.28% | -90.33% | +72.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -99.60% | +98.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -91.09% | +88.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 23.19% | -20.37% |
Volatility
LCF vs. WEBS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) is 2.69%, while Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) has a volatility of 15.72%. This indicates that LCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCF | WEBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 15.72% | -13.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 43.46% | -34.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.92% | 57.60% | -45.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 81.81% | -66.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 89.84% | -74.37% |
LCF vs. WEBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than WEBS's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCF vs. WEBS - Dividend Comparison
LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than WEBS's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF | 0.52% | 0.55% | 0.63% | 0.71% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares | 3.92% | 3.77% | 8.02% | 8.51% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 1.11% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCF and WEBS have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEBS has higher volatility (15.72%) compared to LCF (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCF dropped -18.28% vs WEBS's -99.63%.
On 3-year performance, LCF leads with 17.35% vs -49.47% for WEBS. On fees, LCF is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, LCF has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, LCF has performed better with a 17.35% return vs -49.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LCF is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WEBS.
WEBS has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.52% for LCF.
LCF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while WEBS is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 1.07% for WEBS.
LCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCF and WEBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer