LCF vs. TEXN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LCF (Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF) and TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. LCF is actively managed, while TEXN is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TEXN.

Performance

LCF vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 26.24% return.

LCF

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: 5.23%
• 6M: 6.34%
• 1Y: 22.60%
• 3Y*: 17.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TEXN

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 26.24%
• 6M: 26.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCF vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF	5.23%	12.29%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	26.24%	8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LCF and TEXN is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.49

LCF vs. TEXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LCF	TEXN
Technology	32.9%	15.5%
Communication Services	16.9%	3.6%
Financial Services	15.4%	4.1%
Healthcare	10.8%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	10.8%
Industrials	5.3%	16.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	2.1%
Energy	2.0%	36.1%
Real Estate	1.5%	4.2%
Basic Materials	0.5%	0.8%
Utilities	-	2.9%

Return for Risk

LCF vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCF

LCF Risk / Return Rank: 50
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCF vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCF	TEXN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCF	TEXN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	2.78	-1.73

Drawdowns

LCF vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and TEXN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCF	TEXN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.28%	-6.34%	-11.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	0.00%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.82%	-1.13%	-1.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LCF	TEXN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.42%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.86%	14.22%	-2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	14.22%	+1.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.47%	14.22%	+1.25%

LCF vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCF vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison

LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than TEXN's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF	0.52%	0.55%	0.63%	0.71%	0.24%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	1.01%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCF and TEXN in my portfolio?

LCF and TEXN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LCF or TEXN?

On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCF or TEXN?

TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCF or TEXN?

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.52% for LCF.

What is the main difference between LCF and TEXN?

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.20% for TEXN.