LCF vs. SIXA
LCF (Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF) and SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCF returned 16.22%/yr vs 20.22%/yr for SIXA. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for SIXA.
Performance
LCF vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than SIXA's 14.76% return.
LCF
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXA
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 12.02%
- YTD
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- —
LCF vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF | 5.83% | 17.20% | 20.71% | 26.20% | -4.72% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 14.76% | 15.52% | 22.70% | 11.98% | 3.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCF and SIXA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2022 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LCF and SIXA has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
LCF vs. SIXA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCF
SIXA
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LCF
SIXA
Communication Services
LCF
SIXA
Financial Services
LCF
SIXA
Healthcare
LCF
SIXA
Consumer Cyclical
LCF
SIXA
Industrials
LCF
SIXA
Consumer Defensive
LCF
SIXA
Energy
LCF
SIXA
Real Estate
LCF
SIXA
Basic Materials
LCF
SIXA
-
Utilities
LCF
-
SIXA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCF vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank
LCF
SIXA
LCF vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCF | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.39 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 3.47 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 13.14 | -8.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCF vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, roughly equal to the maximum SIXA drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and SIXA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCF | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.28% | -18.38% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -5.59% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.28% | -11.22% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | 0.00% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -2.95% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 1.47% | +1.53% |
Volatility
LCF vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) at 2.40%. This indicates that LCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCF | SIXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 2.40% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 6.99% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 8.89% | +3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 12.78% | +2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 13.28% | +2.16% |
LCF vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCF vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison
LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SIXA's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF | 0.52% | 0.55% | 0.63% | 0.71% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 2.00% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCF and SIXA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCF has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to SIXA (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCF dropped -18.28% vs SIXA's -18.38%.
On 3-year performance, SIXA leads with 20.22% vs 16.22% for LCF. On fees, LCF is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 20.22% return vs 16.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LCF is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.52% for LCF.
They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCF and SIXA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer