LCAP vs. SCHX
LCAP (Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. LCAP is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. Over the past year, LCAP returned 27.27% vs 27.36% for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCAP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
LCAP vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCAP achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 10.72% return.
LCAP
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- 27.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
LCAP vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF | 12.02% | 18.16% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 20.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCAP and SCHX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | 0.94 |
The correlation between LCAP and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
LCAP vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCAP
SCHX
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Technology
LCAP
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
LCAP
SCHX
Financial Services
LCAP
SCHX
Communication Services
LCAP
SCHX
Healthcare
LCAP
SCHX
Industrials
LCAP
SCHX
Energy
LCAP
SCHX
Utilities
LCAP
SCHX
Basic Materials
LCAP
SCHX
Real Estate
LCAP
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
LCAP
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCAP vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
LCAP
SCHX
LCAP vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCAP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 3.05 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.03 | 13.85 | -1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCAP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.29 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.85 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
LCAP vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCAP drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAP and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCAP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.31% | -34.33% | +23.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -9.02% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.70% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -3.97% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 1.98% | +0.29% |
Volatility
LCAP vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 2.98% and 2.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCAP | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 2.91% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.16% | 9.02% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 11.99% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 17.12% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 18.15% | -1.27% |
LCAP vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCAP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCAP vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
LCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than SCHX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF | 0.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, LCAP and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LCAP has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to SCHX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCAP dropped -11.31% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 1-year performance, SCHX leads with 27.36% vs 27.27% for LCAP. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 27.36% return vs 27.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for LCAP.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.10% for LCAP.
They also come from different issuers: Principal and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LCAP and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCAP and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer